314
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Carighan@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

So I mean, most of us knew this beforehand and being on the fediverse we probably do not really care, but what was always on the horizon has no happened, the owner of Squabblr finally had enough having to be a decent person and has decided that his site is now "free speech purism", so he gets to continue to insult LGBTQ people like he always does.

Seems from the comments that some other admins disagreed with the decision (so there were some decent people on that site!) and either left or were removed.

Not entirely surprising the whole thing, granted.

(edit)
Also, apologies as this isn't truly reddit news but Squabblr was one of the sites frequently brought up in /r/redditalternatives so I figured this might still be relevant?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danielton@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

A ton of people flocked there because they think the Fediverse is too confusing, so now they're going to Discuit.

I have accounts on both out of curiosity, but I had a feeling something weird was going to go down on Squabblr. I just got a weird vibe from that place at first. I am not sure about Discuit yet, but it's yet another centralized service people are using because the fediverse is "too confusing"...

[-] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 year ago

Yeah I've literally made accounts in squabbles and lemmy at the same time. At first squabbles was great, but somehow there's something there that I couldn't describe. I continued to go to lemmy but I've stopped going to squabbles for weeks now. And suddenly this!

Sometimes our instinct is spot on and we got to listen to it more often.

[-] utiandtheblowfish@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The commitment to tweet-like self posts is what made me leave. I don’t like posting an image or article without being able to provide a title.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Roundcat@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

I honestly prefer fediverse remain as that complex open source alt, because it's one of the few filters we have for users here.

I honestly don't believe rapid growth is healthy for any platform, and we've even seen it here with how comments and memes are getting increasingly vitriolic and offensive. Fuck, antivax memes are starting to appear on lemmy.ml's meme community.

I'm starting to think Beehaw had the right idea with vetting users, because there people here who think Lemmy should be another 4chan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

How is make an account on an instance, got to all, subscribe to interesting places, hard? It’s almost the exact same formula as Reddit

[-] Destragras@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When the majority of the world has been using centralised platforms that don't have the complexities federated platforms do, it's understandable that there will be people that get confused over why there are several "Lemmy" servers, or why they can't sign into a Lemmy server when they signed up on another, or why when they try to find a Lemmy community on their server they can't see it, but they can in Google.

Somehow email providers have avoided this problem, I think because they are pre-installed on devices as the "Email" app.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] fastfinge@rblind.com 8 points 1 year ago

We need more topical instances. Nobody found PHPBB's confusing. Let people sign up for an account on the blindness instance, and the cooking instance, and the gaming instance. Eventually they'll discover that they can use one account for everything, and it's just easier to do it that way. But in the meantime they're not confused. We're probably going to market rblind.com that way; a spot for blind folks to network. Eventually they'll discover the federated communities on there own, without us pushing it on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Except going to "all" only provides content from other instances that people on your instance are subscribed to. That is not well understood nor well explained. Whereas "all" on reddit is actually "all."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] cassetti@kbin.social 50 points 1 year ago

Funny, during the boycott of Reddit when squabbles was growing, I signed up and created two new communities - one for earbuds and one for vaporents (dry herbal vaporizing).

My earbuds community was quicky approved, but the vaporents group took almost a week before it was approved. It's almost like the site's owner (since back then he had no mods or admin team) was hesitant when it came to something possibly clandestine in nature. I guess drugs aren't cool, but hate speech is?

[-] febra@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Sucks. We had lots of fun there when it first started. But I've deleted my account now. It's hilarious to watch Jake try and make an empire. What a loser.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

It's already falling apart and I haven't even heard of it. Sounds about right when it comes to chats and social networks these days.

[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

I've legit never heard of Squabblr or this... Discuit? What even are these?

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Reddit alternatives that didn’t pick up a lot of steam yet. We’ll see if they end up winning out over the fediverse or reddit itself, looks like squabblr won’t if it’s already gone the truth social route

[-] Dudwithacake@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Squabblr was called squabbles until a very recent rebrand. You may've known it under its old name instead.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

That was this stupid Reddit + Twitter mix, right? Never understood why some people were hyping that platform up so much.

[-] Dudwithacake@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It's pretty alright. The dev is pretty fast, churned out a majority of the site between a month before reddit killed 3rd party apps and today. Decently responsive to requests and stuff too. But the site just didn't grow, and the head dev was never okay with giving up sole leadership.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hot damn. I was reading the name and thought first its about squabbles, which I considered to be checking alongside lemmy how it develops.

So I was briefly shocked about this development, then I realised this says squabblr and not squabbles. And then I read your post.

Rollercoaster.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

This is why non-federated services are crap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Have they learned nothing from the failure of Voat?

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Nah, in the minds of right-wingers that just means they were unfairly censored by the woke trans left jewish globalist elite.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

“Let’s copy Twitter and Parler, those are soo successful!”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Echo71Niner@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

The sole motive behind transforming a three-month-old online forum into a "Limited Liability Company", which they did, appears to stem from either intentions of selling it or the reception of funding, consequently relinquishing your authority over it.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

Since "free speech" is a dogwhistle, what should a hypothetical place actually interested in free speech as more than just a bigotry shield call what they're trying to do? Some place interested in allowing discussion of objectionable topics without bigotry?

Yes, whatever, those don't exist anywhere, you don't need to respond with that tidbit. Humor the hypothetical here.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Call it "Open Discussion". Make it clear that the purpose of the site is to allow for discussion from all walks of life and perspectives, but that it has to be actual civil discussion. Outright hatred and bigotry, as well as arguing in bad faith, aren't helpful or productive in an open discussion, and as such would be shunned and banned. This way, you can still have opinions that aren't "mainstream", but you won't be removed as long as you're civil and respectful about it. Doing this will attract people who are really interested in hearing other perspectives and sharing their own, instead of alt-right shitheads looking for another place to infest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

How about hate free (tm) free speech

Or "I can't believe its not bigotry"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Kantiberl@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

It's starting to worry me that "free speech" has become something to be feared and avoided. Avoiding confrontation to your beliefs just makes you and your beliefs weaker.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Of course, but it's important to keep in mind that so-called "free speech absolutists" don't actually want free speech. They want freedom of consequences for their very specific, narrow, non-free speech. They would love to censor the living shit out of everybody else.

So there's a difference between free speech, and, well, "free speech".

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Yup, that's been my experience of listening to them as well.

It's so enticing to people that are unfamiliar with the narrative that free speech absolution is the ideal and that these guys are standing up for it. When you pay attention they bend their own rules for themselves all the time.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] SeatBeeSate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The term is being abused as a dog whistle for freedom to pass prejudice and discrimination. Being apposed to a "free speech" platform risks you as being against said free speech. It's falling under the paradox of tolerance concept.

[-] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

"Free speech" has become an anti-feature now due to the prevalence of people who use it to justify enabling bigotry. It's sad.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Your comment history is a cesspool. Yikes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] danielton@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I completely agree. I am a stressed sideliner politically, and I like to hear differing opinions, but I'm so tired of the term "free speech" being associated with alt-right dog whistle rhetoric.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kerandir@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Here I go deleting an account, sigh, I liked the platform there

[-] Skyline969@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I may not be onto anything here, this may just be a coincidence. However, the timing of these two events are suspicious.

1: Squabbles.io rebrands to squabblr.co. The .io domain explicitly forbids anything that may be considered illegal by any country. The site could be shut down if this is violated. You know what would be considered hate speech by some countries, such as Canada? Discrimination of someone based on their gender identity, ie trans people.

2: Squabblr rebrands to a “free speech” website and removes all explicit mention of LGBT+ being protected under their ToS. Within microseconds (slight exaggeration, but within less than 24 hours) people are chiming in with the “trans women are not women” statements.

Was that planned, or just extremely unfortunate timing?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

what the fuck is squabbler?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] balderdash9@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The sole dev of Squabblr (Jayclees) really needs to hire someone to do the community management/PR side of things. He is great at programming but he keeps making snap top-down decisions that go against what the userbase wants. And his use of language (i.e., "free speech platform") sounds like a fkn dog whistle.

All these big names on Squabblr going to Discuit like the devs can't do the exact same thing over there. I'm tired of migrating platforms. If Lemmy doesn't work out, then I'm going to just go touch grass for fun.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

It sounds like a dog whistle because it is a dog whistle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pat@kbin.run 8 points 1 year ago

IMO if sites want to take a "free speech" approach without allowing bigots, maybe they should adopt the Canadian law. We don't have free speech, we have what's known as "freedom of expression". Essentially, we can say whatever unless it's hate speech or bigoted.

Yeah, Canada has censorship, but it's essentially just to censor racist idiots and homophobic fools.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
314 points (92.2% liked)

Reddit

17443 readers
95 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS