386
submitted 1 year ago by bady@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dotslashme@infosec.pub 28 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sasuke@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 year ago

ITT: Things people personally think are scammy, but not actual legally-defined scams.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Mostly_Frogs@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Anti_Weeb_Penguin@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vd1n@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

HR departments in corporate jobs.

[-] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure you know what the word “scam” means.

[-] Simba@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

You don't want to deal with the shit HR handles for you.

I'm sure there are plenty of bad, bureaucratic messes, but 3/4 of the HR departments I the last 10 years have been quite helpful.

The outlier was just not very communicative, but otherwise good.

Maybe it's the industry. I work in clinical so we're used to documenting the fuck out of everything. HR mandated documentation is just another step to cover all of our asses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

stonks-up in general.

When some talking head talks about why stonks-down today or stonks-up today, the real reason is "insiders traded it that way" with a mix of "this is how rich assholes feel."

[-] BigBen103@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Lottery's the expected value is always lower than the prize of a ticket. And even if you win it is on the back of other poor desparete people who lost. An then there is the fact winning often leads to a lot of other problems.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

Neither are scams but the UK is fond of permanently doing temporary things. Income tax in the UK was first imposed as a temporary measure to fund the Napoleonic Wars but after Waterloo it was never repealed since it brought in so much. Same sort of deal for the 70 mph national speed limit, it was a temporary measure in the 1960s apparently in response to someone caning it down the motorway in an AC Cobra and as we know, there’s nothing more permanent than a temporary solution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] temptest@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Enron, perhaps. I think it qualifies.

A good documentary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron:_The_Smartest_Guys_in_the_Room

[-] dukeGR4@monyet.cc 17 points 1 year ago

Phoebus Cartel, essentially the few oligopolistic light bulb companies got together and colluded and intentionally reduced the lifespan of light bulbs.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Battle Passes

But in history it took forever for people in Holland to realize that Tulips are not worth entire plots of land

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] moitoi@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Neoliberalism!

The second is financialization.

Both are huge scams still running.

[-] Geostorm@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

1950 to present antipsychotics whose severe side effects are written off as crazy talk.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Are we allowed to mention capitalism and brexit?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] earthseedle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Bernie Madoff investment scandal. Started in the 1970’s and continued into the 2000’s. It eventually dissolved in 2008 during the financial crisis. There’s a really great documentary on Netflix about it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
386 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
535 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS