455
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So many publications are not worth reading.

Im all in for a revolution of science.

No more bullshitting. No "800 words" required.

If youre able to explain something in 5 sentences and put a table and plot with the results. Do it. No need to elaborate in 5 pages how fucked up your ability is to use thesaurus for synonyms.

Edit. Usually i read the headline and put the article into my bibtex library.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed. The worst part to write for me are always the fucking "introduction"s, explain why we did this, why it deserves your attention and a lot of addedd fluff. I did it because I wanted to. Read it if you are interested, go away if not.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

I had this problem for my bachelor thesis. I used some other paper about machine learning and changed some parameters. Others I didn't touch because I didn't knew what they do. Now I have to explain why I copied those parameters. I just wrote in testing they proved to be the best.

Yes I totally agreee.

[-] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

5 pages?!??! In my discipline, we spend five pages just kissing reviewer 2’s behind and begging people to take an interest. Then we spend 20 pages citing everyone and their adviser and their adviser’s second cousin on the off chance that they’re married to reviewer 2. Then you get a copy-paste of the documentation of one of the five datasets that everyone uses.

Ive read about such stories. Must be awful.

Im sorry for you. That really sucks.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Well, sometimes I get to read the abstract and the conclusions. And then I get a deserved week off.

[-] weariedfae@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the first thing you do!

Skim the figures.

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

True, true.

[-] HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Upper management material

[-] teft@startrek.website 25 points 1 year ago

I read the summary of the abstract that a journalist with no science degree wrote.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read abstract.


This comment has been summarized. The original (15 words) has been reduced by 80%.

This comment was made by a human, and if it was helpful please reply to it with "good human".

[-] teft@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

"good human"

[-] Bademantel@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the article and write my essay about it.

-- Thank you

[-] BertieWooster@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I've added it to zotero. I'll read it later when I have time

[-] sid64@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Don't do this to me.

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I skimmed the headline.

[-] bastian_5@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I tried to download the PDF but then I just got errors...

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I read a Facebook post

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
455 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

11453 readers
588 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS