126
submitted 11 months ago by Masimatutu@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 11 months ago

They'll win if they file legal action. Their servers are not a public service and they offer no invitation for Beeper to use them for compute. A podcast app developer likened it to if a competing app tried to use his servers to sync podcast subscriptions. When you frame it as anything other than a big corporation stomping on a smaller company, it's obviously stealing resources. I am not endorsing either side. Just stating a fact.

[-] Deemo@bookwormstory.social 1 points 11 months ago

Beeper did mention the DMCA protection on reverse engineering.

That being said regardles if beeper wins or looses. If apple sues and at the same time breaks beeper mini they could run into financial trouble very quickly.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't really get the big deal, it feels like a janky workaround when people could just use a different messaging platform and wait till Apple complies with the EU order

Around where I am, lots of friends have Apple devices but chats are still scattered across various messaging platforms

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Its just the silliest things. I would love for these people to be strapped into a chair, forcibly made to download Signal and open account, and be like "Oh, deng it Buck, its really not such a big fucking deal that I was bitching about nothing in relation to"

Do it to everyone who refuses out of non-principle and suddenly, the bullshit excuse ("but but nobody's on it") evaporates

[-] kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I used Signal since it was called TextSecure and I don't think I ever successfully got another person using it.
Eventually uninstalled it because it was just largely useless, anytime I messaged a friend who seemed to be using it they were more confused than anything.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Are they simple? Like whats to be confused about? Its literally a fact its no more complicated than Whatsapp, what say you now (assuming we're all still operating in good faith)

People who make extraordinar(ily)y silly claims like "Signal is HARD 😢", I don't think anyone can help them

[-] snowe@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

No one I know uses WhatsApp either (thank fuck). No one wants to download another app that now they have to juggle between different sets of people. I’m a software dev and even I hate all this nonsense of ten different messaging apps. On any given day I might use slack, discord, Zulip, Google messages, imessage, and matrix. Two is too many, this is just ridiculous. Absolutely no one in America wants to be using this many apps to communicate. Which is why most people just use the default.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but I enjoy even less the notion that there are mutliple other little buddies and partners listening in and parsing/mining my conversations

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'd argue that Signal is the cleanest and simplest messaging platform out there

If anything, the complicated thing might be that the data is stored locally on your device, so you need to take extra steps to back up the data

But every platform has some small quirks to learn. People figure out how to adjust to all the other "big" platforms because they want to use them. It's not that Signal or Fediverse is harder, some people will use it as an excuse to feel justified in not switching

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Ya its annoying how sometimes, people need to be "made" to see 👀

[-] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Last I checked, Signal still hasn't fixed their giant UX problem, which is that when you first install the app, it announces you to other Signal users on your contact list. This makes it completely unusable for anybody who actually needs, you know, a secure messenger (like a domestic abuse victim).

I mean I use Signal every day and I love it. But it irks me that they're like "Oh we're super secure. Unless you're trying to get help from your abusive husband, in which case, guess what, we just snitched on you to your abusive husband! Good luck with that!"

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 1 points 11 months ago

Signal notifies users who have your phone number in their contact list; it doesn’t matter if you have them in theirs. It’s an unfortunate side effect of their using phone numbers as identifiers instead of usernames or friend codes or something.

Still a problem, and you basically need a new number as a workaround if you’re trying to conceal that you’re using it. On the upside, they don’t get access to your profile without your permission, so if an ex sees that you signed up they don’t know if it’s you or if you changed your number

[-] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Same for me. Was never able to get literally a single other person using it.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

Or, a step further, since the original Beeper is a Matrix server with various open source messaging bridges slapped on it, with a fancy client interface... Why not just fucking use a Matrix server with those bridges set up? Or even set up your own Matrix server and iMessage bridge?

Beeper is literally paying people to set up open sources services for you. I'm not against this, it's a good business model, but Beeper has obviously put the cart before the horse here.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Its just not sustainable, any relation to closed fundamentally insecure "services" like iMessage. iMessage is dogshit, always has been, never won't not be

[-] scott@lem.free.as 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Never won't not be

Triple negative. Nice!

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That isn't not how I do 🤣

[-] kpw@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Signal is just another walled garden silo with no real value over WhatsApp just owned by a different organization. I won't use anything which is not XMPP compatible.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

A wholly different organization; non-profit actually. And it is open source. Those are pretty big advantages over WhatsApp. I’m pro xmpp, but Signal is an improvement over WhatsApp.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

and wait till Apple complies with the EU order

I thought the EU had determined that iMessage will not be subject to the open messaging provisions.

iMessage will reportedly dodge EU regulations, won’t have to open up

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Seems like they're shooting themselves in the foot with that one, non-Apple users usually aren't willing to convert to Apple products, and this is only going to widen that gap.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

The whole walled garden thing feels like an effective way to keep potential customers out.

[-] wellee@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Omg who cares or even uses this 😂

[-] autotldr 0 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It wasn't the resulting lower-quality images, loss of encryption, and strange "Emphasized your message" reaction texts.

There was a gathering on Saturday, and she had to double-check with a couple people about the details after showing up inadvertently early at the wrong spot.

Migicovsky pointed to Epic's victory at trial against Google's Play Store ("big tech") as motivation.

Citing privacy, security, and spam concerns, Apple stated it would "continue to make updates in the future" to protect users.

I asked Migicovsky by direct message if, given Apple's stated plan to continually block it, there could ever be a point at which Beeper's access was "settled," or "back up and running," as he put it in his post on X (formerly Twitter).

"Us," he clarified, meant both Apple's customers using iMessage and Android users trying to chat securely with iPhone friends.


The original article contains 432 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is by far the most useless thing I’ve seen you generate.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee -5 points 11 months ago

I hate Apple, but they are entirely in the right here

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
126 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

34895 readers
990 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS