271
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Frustrated by “rogue buses” from Texas dropping off migrants by the thousands, the mayors of New York, Chicago and Denver are trying to slow the surge by requiring the bus operators to coordinate arrivals under the threat of impound, fines and even jail time.

Last week, 14 busloads of migrants from Texas made their way to New York City – the highest total recorded since spring 2022, Mayor Eric Adams said, citing the city’s Asylum Seeker Arrival Center.

At the direction of Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, the Lone Star state has bused over 90,000 migrants to “sanctuary cities” run by Democrats like Washington, DC, New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, Denver and Los Angeles since April 2022, according to numbers released by the governor’s office Friday.

In justifying the busing of migrants who cross the southern border, Abbott in a statement last year said “it was just Texas and Arizona that bore the brunt of all the chaos and problems that come with it.”

“Now, the rest of America can understand exactly what is going on,” he said.

(page 2) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Time to transfer federal funding from Texas to the states receiving these rogue busses. These welfare states really need a reminder on what's keeping them functioning to begin with.

[-] teh_bishop@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Except that I’m sure to be downvoted into oblivion here like I was on Reddit, I can explain pretty much any part of this process and program for transport as I was the guy that created the whole thing before it was turned into a political tool to subrogate humans. I left Texas and state govt but the way they’re being misled is not being allowed to know the route that they’re being taken on and kept in the dark to try and ensure they all end up at the end city even though the document they sign says they can get off anywhere (which they can) but it won’t work out that way.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

Doesn't California get more immigrants by most measures? At least they seem to run their state in a way that works.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Can we vote to rename Texas: NIMBY?

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Or just return it back to Mexico, problem solved

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today -3 points 10 months ago

Can we give Texas to one of the Mexican cartels so they can find out how good they had it?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

They already have the GOP.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
271 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3949 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS