146
submitted 10 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Statistically, someone carrying a badge is more likely to be a criminal than someone carrying money.

[-] constantokra@lemmy.one 3 points 10 months ago

Do you have a source for that, because i'd love to be able to use it.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Just count the news stories about "local person with a bag of cash responds to domestic disturbance call, shoots elderly woman, her grandson, and their dog" or "local person with a bag of cash kills pedestrians in DUI crash, suspended with pay".

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 37 points 10 months ago

I don't know how or why asset forfiture was ever allowed, moral, or legal but it should have been outlawed a very long time ago.

Legalized thievery is worse than actual theft. It is corrupt and morally bankrupt.

[-] Truck_kun@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

If, BIG IF, forfeiture is allowed, it should only be court ordered after a conviction, and recovered funds should not go to anyone related to the seizure, or ordering of forfeiture, as well as no metrics of such forfeiture contributing to any potential bonus, benefit, or payout for 'a job well done'.

For sure, police should not be allowed to make that call.

Stuff like this should never happen: https://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/us/philadelphia-drug-bust-house-seizure/index.html

An inanimate objects should not be able to be named as accessories to crime, the owner of the inanimate object should get due process, and in reality, it should be more of an order to investigate, and access given within reason (like a warrant would do), not forfeiture.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I would prefer to throw that baby out with the bathwater.

Given how corrupt this is now it seems wiser that this just not be a thing at all. I see your point, but I believe it will encourage backsliding to the insanity we have now.

Maybe in 20 years.

[-] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 19 points 10 months ago

After "seizing" a bunch of cash, the police are carrying a bunch of cash. Statement checks out.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Yet if you're not carrying any you're a criminal vagrant, so you're screwed either way

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

Oh cool so the cops are just openly doing banditry now.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Just a lil bit.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 5 points 10 months ago

Funny because anyone carrying a badge is absolutely a criminal.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

I know everyone likes to hate on cryptocurrency, but I think there is something beautiful about cash you can carry entirely in a series of words you've memorized that no one can prove you even have.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Unless you use something like Monero it's still useless since blockchain is neither anonymous, not private and since all exchanges requires KYC (Know Your Customer), your identity will be tied to that money.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

Unless you use something like Monero

So just do that? I don't get this argument that lack of anonymity is a fatal flaw when various effective anonymizing solutions exist.

But anyway that talking point isn't even relevant in this circumstance. It doesn't matter if it is possible in theory for someone with access to exchange records to uncover a link between you and your crypto holdings. Cops looking to mug you at a traffic stop or the airport are not going to find it practical to do that, and even if they did they have no way to take it from you simply because it isn't a physical object. It's an objective fact that cryptocurrency is massively more resistant to civil forfeiture than physical cash.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don’t get this argument that lack of anonymity is a fatal flaw when various effective anonymizing solutions exist.

It's only not a flaw if people do take those extra steps. By default, it's not anonymous and that is an important caveat.

It’s an objective fact that cryptocurrency is massively more resistant to civil forfeiture than physical cash.

As is a bank account if that's the threat model. Everything is relative to a threat model you want to protect from.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

As is a bank account if that’s the threat model.

I see this as being about control as much as threat model. Using a bank as a defense against civil forfeiture is exactly what these cops are calling people criminals for not doing.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

I agree with you there.

[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
146 points (99.3% liked)

Interesting Global News

2607 readers
374 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS