106
submitted 1 year ago by bbsm3678@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Considering switching away from Fedora and to another distribution. Does anyone have any suggestions for distributions I should consider?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fernandu00@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Switched from Ubuntu to fedora recently.. I'm pretty happy with it and it's package manager

[-] Grangle1@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If you are a KDE user or are interested in it, I've been running KDE Neon for a few months and don't plan on changing any time soon. Stable release, Ubuntu LTS based without the forced snaps (though snaps are in the repos if you want them), comes with the standard Ubuntu LTS repos and flatpak installed out of the box, with the one difference there being that it will update to the latest stable version of KDE software as it's released. Basically a de-snapped Kubuntu LTS with all the latest KDE stuff. Works great for me.

[-] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Kde neon, latest Plasma on a stable ubuntu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'm also on Fedora and love it, but I'm thinking of switching to OpenMandriva ROME. OpenSUSE's Tumbleweed is another option.

[-] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

For all the praise I give Debian, I still just run Kubuntu and call it a day.

It's not that Debian's particularly hard to install or set up (pretty quick and easy after you've done it enough times, though there is also the Live CD with Calamares for an easier install), and it's honestly better than (*)Ubuntu in terms of official repos (at least Sid is), but I sometimes just find it simpler to install Kubuntu, unsnap it, remove apport, and get on with everything else.

Maybe I'll go MX or something at some point and just enable systemd because I use it and out of the "anti-systemd" distros, it's the most "hey, if you want to use systemd, no prob".

Actually, for Debian, another good option is Spiral Linux. It's basically just Debian, but with btrfs, snapshots, and zRAM all set up (from the same dude who does GeckoLinux, so very familiar with btrfs). Maybe once the new Bookworm-based ISO is up, I'll switch over.

[-] gunpachi 2 points 1 year ago

I have used Gecko in the past. I really liked it. I'll be checking out spiral linux now. Thanks

[-] xengi@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Arch on everything with a screen. NixOS on everything without.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] secret301@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I wanna move to nix but my monkey brain can't understand it. Might just take the plunge anyways

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] harl3k1n@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

blendOS because it gives you access to all the good stuff, including the AUR and even Android apps.

[-] Zoop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Oooh, neat! I hadn't heard of that. Thank you so much for sharing this! I look forward to trying it out. Exciting!!

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I have been meaning to give a BlendOS a try. VanillaOS as well ( though I kind of want to wait until they rebase on Debian ).

[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I recently Switched to Fedora Gnome and have been liking it.

Lot more user friendly than Mint imo.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Neon right now i will try pop os when the new cosmic desktop drops

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] amminadabz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty happy on Ultramarine. Its like Fedora but with more repos by default, media drivers, more DE options, and a bunch of more reasonable defaults for daily all-purpose use.

[-] happyhippo@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Frederic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm old too :-/

  • CP/M
  • DOS
  • Windows3, 95, 98
  • BeOS
  • some Debian and Mandrake
  • Windows XP
  • Ubuntu (a long time)
  • Mint/Cinnamon (I hated it, it was quick, maybe a year)
  • MX/Xfce (since ~2016)

I may try Arch on a old laptop just to play with it.----

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I hated it, it was quick, maybe a year.

I think we have a very different definition of quick, my friend. I've been on Linux for about a year and a half, most of which on Arch and recently on NixOS.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

CP/M. Ya got me there. I guess I can say EOS though ( Coleco ADAM ) and Tandy DOS 2.1.

If you don’t want to jump straight into Arch, give EndeavourOS a go. It is only 20 packages on top of the 90,000 you get in Arch ( so, it is Arch ) but it is a breeze to install and is sensibly configured out of the box. Once installed, it is Arch ( don’t let the elitists tell you it isn’t ). It uses the real Arch repos and runs the real Arch kernels. Of course, if you have the time, vanilla Arch may be even more fun.

[-] experimentmapass@social.trom.tf 1 points 1 year ago

@bbsm3678 You should try TROMjaro, and all linux distros should take example from it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
106 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

48325 readers
692 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS