this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8136 readers
2 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
3
Beehaw* defederated us? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by can@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MeowdyPardner@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I think it's easy to take this personally but I think it's more about the moderation tools in Lemmy not being adequate at the moment so this is the best bandaid solution for now. We need to quickly put effort into developing better moderation tools like limiting other servers without fully defederating, limiting specific communities, forcing nsfw on communities/instances, proxying reports to origin servers so admins have better feedback on their instance user's bad behavior, and many other things if we want to prevent defederating like this from being the only option.

I think infighting about this decision and differing moderation styles instead of focusing together on moderation challenges and tooling deficiencies risks tearing the community / federation apart and is counterproductive to the goal of being better than reddit.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

beehaw are trying to be a perfectly moderated and "high quality" community and they are struggling to keep up with it when federated to other large instances.

I think they might need to change their methods because it is inevitable that some crap is going to be going on in low effort posts and comments, but defederating one very large instance from other very large instances is against the whole idea the movement.

[–] Lund3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I specifically just deleted my beehaw account and created one here because of this... This move makes me reconsider this whole lemmy thing.

[–] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

yeah, was starting to like it here, but honestly if any instance will just defederate the second something inconvenient happens... we won't have a site with good content that will keep people around

[–] kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is surfacing a fundamental division between mindsets in federation: the people who say don't worry about which instance you're on are bought into the promise that federation can "just work" like email. But the reality is that if you care about moderation at all (like, even to the extent of being for or against having any of it) then sooner or later you're going to have to make harder decisions about instances.

It's pretty normal for long-term fediverse users to change instances several times over the course of however long this stuff has been around. It's unclear to me whether any existing Lemmy instances would be a good fit for me in the long term TBH and I would expect that to be true for some time, as so many instances are still figuring things out internally.

Defederation decisions like beehaw made are extremely normal and rational. With their level of moderation staffing and for their user base, they determined it was unsustainable to remain federated with instances that were generating more moderation workload. If it wasn't them today it would be another instance tomorrow; this will keep happening.

Also, I see a lot of folks saying this is lazy for beehaw, but it's important to understand that from their perspective, this problem wouldn't arise if moderators here were keeping a cleaner house and preventing bad actors from using the platform. (Not saying either take is entirely correct.)

In a sense, moderation best practices on the fediverse are inimically hostile to scaling the fediverse up to new users. (And if you ask folks with smaller but prosperous instances that have healthy internal vibes, they'll probably tell you this is good.)

This is much more fraught on Lemmy than it is on Mastodon, because you're building communities hosted on a particular instance and there's not currently a way to move the community. So, if I were to start a community here and then finally decide a year from now that this place is too big a defederation target to stay on, what do I do?

Similarly, to avoid endless duplication of communities, folks have been encouraged to participate with existing communities instead of starting a new one on their own instance everytime. But anyone here who has gotten involved with communities on Beehaw will now no longer be able to do so unless they move to a different instance. (Which may be hard, as open instances that are easy to join are the ones that are harder for small instances to handle, which is what caused this in the first place.)

Some of those folks are going to create their own alternative communities on their servers, which to any third-party servers not in the loop on the defederation drama will be potentially confusing. This has the potential to create a cultural tend toward polarization of community norms between everything goes and what we see on Mastodon as content warning policing, but of which are, to me, undesirable.

The best case scenario is that the majority of large communities end up being hosted on instances that have sufficiently rigorous moderation standards and sufficiently robust moderation staff to not impose an unsustainable workload on smaller instances. Then as long as everyone who's not a nazi federates with those instances, things should go smoothly...ish. But that's hard both because "sufficiently rigorous" is different for everyone and because moderation labor doesn't grow on trees.

[–] jsqribe@feedly.j-cloud.uk 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Who else here is chilling on their own instance watching this shit unfold with some popcorn 😂

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am a lurker over there so this decision literally changes nothing about how I use beehaw and my community is still awesome so I'm all good👍

[–] jsqribe@feedly.j-cloud.uk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shh 🤫 they might defederate us too if we say too much

[–] Thedogspaw@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'm on midwest.social and I'm a lurker so I got nothing to lose DEFERATE ME DEFERATE DIZ NUTS

[–] LazizPulao@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is there a SubRedditDrama community equivalent here?

[–] Wololo@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

There is a fediverse drama sub in lemmy.ca

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yet another reason why it's great to be Canadian.

[–] epyon22@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Sh.itjustworks is Canadian lol

[–] MysticSmear@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

as someone who just joined, and is still trying to understand "federated" can someone give me an ELI5 rundown of what this means? I thought it didn't matter which instance you joined because they were all connected, does this mean that other instances can just... block an entire instance?

[–] iSharted@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's essentially like email. If you have a gmail, you can communicate with anyone on any other email service. If gmail determines that spamsite.xyz, you won't send or recieve any emails from that domain. Same thing here. You're using lemmy.world. If lemmy.world defederates with my server sh.itjust.works, you won't see my messages. We will just never cross paths.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What if someone from lemmy.world makes a comment, and someone from lemmy.ca replies to the comment?

Would someone from sh.itjust.works see the reply to the original comment but not the original comment? Or is the whole thread after that point non-existent after that point?

[–] iSharted@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure on this, but I think it's the latter that you mentioned.

[–] MysticSmear@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

hmm...that seems super counterintuitive to what I thought the fediverse was all about. That would be like Gmail just deciding all Yahoo emails are spam. doesn't this mean that Lemmy will just be a bunch of islands of content that will require users to have multiple accounts for each instance?

[–] iSharted@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If everyone plays nice, you get to have really big islands. But that's only if your overlords (the mods) allow it. If they don't like an instance, see ya! I don't think this happens often other than blocking spam and illegal activity, but you can clearly see how this will make all the mini islands.