0
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Catasaur@lemmy.catasaur.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Between this and the Fedora team wanting to force telemetry on users, I'm starting to shy away from Red Hat.

[-] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

I literally just got Rocky installed on two servers. We were going to field test before migrating to a paid subscription. That sure as hell isn’t happening now. If IBM cannot help but to bite the hand that fed it, then I have little confidence they aren’t going to turn into another Oracle.

[-] Laser@feddit.de -2 points 1 year ago

If IBM cannot help but to bite the hand that fed it

Which hand was feeding them and how are they biting it?

Idc about IBM but the saying makes little sense to me here. It's not like Ubuntu annoying Debian which at one point was their upstream. They find upstream up to fedora and beyond.

If anything, Distros like Alma and Rocky bite the hand that feeds them by offering paid support contracts. Nothing is illegal about that. But I think the saying fits the reverse better.

[-] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You make a good point. I imagine RedHat is doing this less because of Rocky/Alma, and more so because of Oracle.

[-] OldFartPhil@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

This seems like a golden opportunity for distros like Suse and Ubuntu, who offer enterprise support for their free product, to poach some RHEL customers.

[-] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish Ol' Debian would get the love it deserves, especially for enterprise where their "stability over the latest flashiest software" philosophy should really shine. People on the desktop side criticizing how slowly Debian packages update is generally responded with "well it's a server OS first and foremost, the Debian derivatives are more suited for desktop," so why does no one use Debian for servers? And as far as I know Debian has always prioritized stability and reliability above anything else, and have never pulled any sort of corporate antics even close to what Canonical and Red Hat have pulled.

[-] this_is_router@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'm using it. Almost 200 servers at work. No problems whatsoever. I almost smile reading news like this, because it shows me I did the right thing betting on debian

[-] Cal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I hope you can correct me here, but I don't believe Debian offers any commercial support. That's what people are paying for. It is kind of amazing to be able to call a reliable OS vendor when your hardware vendor is blaming the OS and you need a third party to get involved.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Linux

48143 readers
757 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS