526
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 39 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately, it's computer code and there is essentially nothing that can be done to prevent its use. They can only punish its users, and if we know anything about prohibition, it has (at best) zero effect to dissuade potential offenders.

I sincerely hope nobody uses it to generate porn of real people without their consent. With that said, it is highly likely if not absolutely certain that bolstering authority on this issue will have disasterous effects that last for generations. It only takes a brief glance over history to see why.

We have only barely held onto our digital freedom. They are trying to strip it at turn. Now it's "protect the kids" but we are witnessing the narrative shift in real time.

What I'm saying is don't be surprised if using open source software carries a prison sentence in first world countries in the near future.

[-] Maven@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Porn from celebrities without consent was one of the first applications I ever saw it used for back when it was new tech.

And also adding Nicholas Cage into random movie scenes but still...

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Yet, oddly enough, a disappointingly low amount of Nicholas Cage in porn.

[-] Maven@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Be the change you wish to see in the world

[-] seahorse@midwest.social 9 points 9 months ago

Gonna make one called National Pleasure

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago
[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Wieners.

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It would be just like regular porn but Nicholas Cage would also be there.

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I think you're assuming we're discussing regulating deep fakes (the software), when really everyone is talking about regulating deep fakes (, the use of).

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

... This is to say, making it illegal to generate life-like images and videos of celebrities, non-celebrities, and political figures without consent is in no way this doomsday scenario you say.

Defamation and libel are illegal. You can use open-source tools to perform defamation and libel, or you can use those same tools in a way that doesn't constitute defamation and libel.

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Part of the confusion around regulation, at least in the US, is that movie studios such as Disney REALLY want to be able to use deepfakes of celebrities

[-] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

It's foolish to think you can restrict one and not the other, and it's even more foolish to think our authoritarian governments would do that it they could

[-] Tobberone@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

No matter how you turn it, though, AI will be disruptive to life as we know it. The question is how to handle it. No media outlets will be spared until we figure out a way of validating information.

My favourite vision is how an AI robocaller is chatting with an AI answering machine. But honestly, why have a phone at all? All your loved ones calling may just as well be deep fakes trying to scam you for money.

It is clear we need to do something to prepare, but what? As you say, the cat is already out of the bag, so how do we proceed from here? AntiAI-software in the same way we have antivirus software? Even open source self hosting wount be enough, somehow you need to validate who to trust. Even if it would be a start...

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

I really need a Poe’s Law check on this.

I’m shell-shocked from witnessing libertarian tech bros defending deepfake child porn, and I can longer distinguish earnest AI booster sentiment from satire.

Please give me a /s so I can sleep at night.

[-] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

My original post was not sarcasm, but if it helps, let me be explicit: People producing CSAM of any kind, real or generated, need to be put through a wood chipper feet first. I would pay money to do myself.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

How about this: People are allowed produce those nasty AI images, but every image must be registered and anyone viewing is also registered.
Regular counselling is mandatory for those registered

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

I hate that I still have to check out obvious satire to make sure it really is satire now.

The stock photo guy absolutely looks like the kinda person who would make some very... Uncomfortable deepfakes.

[-] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

I would recommend not diving into these comments or else you're gonna find the real-world equivalent of the dude this article is making fun of.

Yikes.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

Or did he?!

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 10 points 9 months ago

Lots of onions eaten in this comment section.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 points 9 months ago

Ethan is showin up big time in these comments. Holy shit.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 8 points 9 months ago

Just like Trump, everything he complains about is projection.

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

You know what? Fuck it. I'm not even into deepfakes. If someone wants to blast rope to me getting railed by waluigi then have at it. The future is now old man.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I don't use or frequently browse deep fakes and I don't think they should be regulated. Governments have never regulated the internet in a way that didn't have cascading negative effects elsewhere.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I believe it's a power grab. The more you regulate or force licensing costs on AI tools the harder it is to use without having large capital.

Meaning those with all the money can use AI while regular people or small companies or startups can't.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
526 points (97.3% liked)

The Onion

4584 readers
830 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS