this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
415 points (96.0% liked)

politics

24850 readers
3137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sky_Lobster@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Yeah, but $200,000 for Trump feels like a joke. It should be more in line with his income to be meaningful.

[–] sab@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, judging by his tax returns his income isn't much to brag about.

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

We aren't even sure those are real as well. It's why NY was prosecuting him for tax fraud.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be honest it probably is just he continues to spew his is a billionaire so it should be a billion dollars see what happens. 200k is a joke.

[–] Gatsby@discuss.online 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That was probably true before he became President but I doubt it is anymore. He spent his entire term lining his pockets with as much taxpayer money as possible... And that's not even taking into account the fact that he's been campaigning this entire time to fund his legal defense against the numerous criminal and civil cases against him.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago

We're talking about a dude that would cash a check for 13 cents tho. Soo....

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Does it feel like the news is all opinion pieces these days? All I see is "someone said something on Twitter" lately.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The steep decline in money available to publishers means that they’re going to cut reporting in favor of paying an intern to copy and paste off of twitter. You end up with twenty different publications summarizing the same AP article with one paragraph, the. a dozen hot takes on twitter by people you’ve never heard of.

And we’re reaching the point where they don’t even need the intern to do it.

[–] StarServal@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What? You don’t want to hear about the latest thing Elon Musk said/did on/with Twitter?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mookulator@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Try reading a reputable news outlet instead of social media

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Very few left my friend, very few.

[–] maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

"Some words"

  • A Dude
[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump still has his passport. He is flying out to Saudi Arabia or israel where the US can't touch him.

[–] sab@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You might need to update your list of countries outside of the US' sphere of influence - those are both close allies. :)

[–] autotldr 17 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The $200,000 bond approved for Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case is significant as it suggests the former president "cannot be trusted" to surrender to authorities for processing, according to a legal expert.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee approved the amount for the former president on Monday, the first time Trump has been asked to post bond in any of the four criminal cases he is involved in.

Discussing the bond arrangement, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman said that while the amount of money is not an issue for the former president, it is noteworthy that Judge McAfee should take steps to ensure that Trump does hand himself in.

But the bigger provision is the anti tampering condition—he can't do anything to intimidate any co-deft or witness or otherwise obstruct the administration of justice," Litman posted on X, formerly Twitter.

The former president is not allowed to communicate with witnesses or any of the 18 other co-defendants in the case, which includes his former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and his ex-personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, except through his lawyers.

Trump was previously accused of witness intimidation via his Truth Social posts by legal experts after suggesting that former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan shouldn't testify to a grand jury just prior to the Fulton County indictment being announced.


The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] explodingkitchen@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In this case, I don't think it's a matter of "so he'll show up in court" as opposed to "so he'll stop shitposting". Which he won't. My wild-ass guess is that the sequence will be Trump violates bond conditions-->original bond is forfeited and new bond is set at a much higher amount, say $1,000,000-->Trump violates second bond--->bond revoked, Trump remanded into custody.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

They shouldn't have even set one. It's just gonna make his base donate.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When's he going to do something that allows the cops to just shoot him?

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

We got a runner…

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Meh. Random lawyer saying things.

Then again, this is trump and you know he's dumb as a rock and always ready to put up a show.

Then again, please please don't show up. I want to watch a SWAT team kick in his door and drag him out screaming "I thought this was America! MAGAFLGHH" and then a cop puts a knee in his neck. I know, will never happen, bit wouldn't that be fun for a change

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"... something of an indignity that he has to post something"

LAWL.. that a former PRESIDENT has to post BOND because he's considered at risk of fleeing the REPUBLIC.. yeah, something of an indignity.. that's exactly what Washington would have said..

on racketeering charges no less.. while still in office.. against a state..

if you trusted him your head is on upside down AND backwards.. get a friend or a priest to knock it off for you, so you can put it back on straight..

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Isn’t that the entire point of pre-trial detention?

[–] Polydextrous@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Interesting example on the importance of proper N- and M-dash usage

[–] Jagermo@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, I kinda hope for a Dog - Trump Showdown

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Premise of the article is flawed. They're setting bond amounts for everyone. Seems like standard procedure in Fulton County, GA.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The article is deceitful, because it's quoting former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman. So it's a former prosecutor saying the $200k bond means Trump cannot be trusted, not the courts saying that.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

U.S. Marshalls to U.S. Secret Service:

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Trump seems to be the type of petty person to bring the bail in pennies.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Which is illegal in certain instances, if you're doing it for the sake of creating a nuisance. Definitely in line with what he does.

That would require more thinking than he's capable of.

load more comments
view more: next ›