610
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The white supremacist right is penetrating the mainstream right with increasing ease.

The Conservative Political Action Conference is the premier gathering of right-wing activists and politicians in America every year, and it serves as a bellwether for the direction of the conservative movement. This year Nazis showed up.

According to an NBC News report, “a group of Nazis who openly identified as national socialists mingled with mainstream conservative personalities, including some from Turning Point USA, and discussed ‘race science’ and antisemitic conspiracy theories.” (Hitler’s Nazi Party was officially called the “National Socialist German Workers’ Party.”) The reporter of the article has video of one of them giving a “heil Hitler”-style salute in the lobby of the hotel where the conference took place and of other members of the group reportedly used the N-word.

This is a critical frog-in-boiling-water moment for the right: The mainstream organs of American conservatism are apparently acclimating to Nazis in their pot. That this group was able to mingle with participants at a high-profile conference, wasn't kicked out of CPAC, and wasn't appropriately condemned is a sign of how contiguous mainstream conservatism has become with white supremacist politics today.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago

I'm old enough to remember when Republicans and Democrats weren't that different... There were always key issues that they disagreed on but at the end of the day the majority of both parties just wanted what was best for the country, and they would even WORK TOGETHER from time to time when it was for the common good... How did the GOP go from that to this white trash hillbilly Nazi bullshit? Are they ever going to recognize that the enemies of democracy have taken over their party? When did they become so complacent?

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 133 points 9 months ago

I remember a clip from a McCain rally and he was going around, asking people questions, letting them talk to the microphone, etc. One lady said she didn't like Obama because he was Muslim. McCain shut her down and said something to the effect of "he's a good man, we just have different opinions on how to run the country". That stands out a lot to me in hindsight.

[-] pelotron@midwest.social 109 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

McCain is one of the old guard Republicans that went down fighting. His final vote thumbs down for the repeal of the ACA was legendary. I didn't vote for him but I do have great respect for him.

Contrast that against all the limp dicks who are silently retiring instead of speaking out and trying to right the ship.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 60 points 9 months ago

He slipped real hard during his presidential bid. Remember how his VP pick was Sarah Palin, for example.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

The beginning of backroom concessions to the crazy wing of the party that are so very, very obvious.

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 14 points 9 months ago

If I remember correctly, he didn't want to nominate her. He wanted Liebermann and didn't even like Palin that much. She was just sort of forced on him.

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Yes, that's what I mean. Noone in their right mind would choose her. This was a forced choice and an indication that the lunatics were if not running the asylum, at least in charge of a big part of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

I think that wasn't quite the beginning of the end, but it was definitely a warning sign for what was to become of the Republican party. I think they saw how Dubya was a moron and that was appealing to a lot of voters, so they thought "there's a recipe for success here."

On a random note, that just led me to this video where the guy who floated Palin's name to McCain said it was "the biggest fucking mistake of his life".

https://youtu.be/ihrCtRCGTro

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

She looks like a damned Rhodes scholar compared to what the GOP is putting up these days.

I'm not disagreeing with you, just a comment on how much farther they've fallen.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago

I think if you go back and watch her speaking she has a lot of gibberish with buzzwords as well. The only difference between her and Lauren Booblejuice or margery klanma is palin's racism and conspiracy theories weren't on full display.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Oh, I remember. She thought "which magazines and newspapers do you read" was a trick question. But Bobo and the Tuber are new levels of stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

McCain might have thought of himself as a responsible conservative, but he was still a part of the machine that has been a regressive force in America over the last 60 years. He did not fight for the heart or soul of the party, and this moment was an example of the flimsy lip service he paid to being a reasonable person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Watch just the first minute of McCain’s concession speech. (Watch the whole thing if you like. It’s pretty good.)

I watched him shut down the boos about Obama at the beginning. He took this very seriously and wouldn’t allow the crowd to get out of line. It was well done, and a great example of statesmanship and fair play.

For just a moment then, I wondered if I had voted for the wrong man in voting for Obama, who was more of an unknown for me at the time. McCain acted very differently in the middle of good campaign, compared to the beginning and the end. I couldn’t support the policies, the attitude, or the man that I saw during the national campaign. Listening to John McCain’s concession speech that night, I remember thinking, "where was this person—this attitude—for the last few months? I might have voted for this person.” The party and the campaign forced him to become something that he wasn’t. If he had been allowed to be more authentic, I think that Obama would have had a narrower victory, if he had won at all.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago

Everyone keeps forgetting about the tea party. It cracks me up. This is totally the tea party having its effect on the right.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

....and the teabaggers were just a rebranding of the hatriots from the 90s. And they were a rebranding of the Birchers....this stuff goes wayyyyy back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's always been there, Harlan Crowe has been a supporter of Clarence Thomas since the early 90's, and the difference between Confederates and Nazis is only razor thin, so those types have always quasi gotten along, or even where the Klan meetings were on w Wednesday and the Nazi meetings were on Thursdays for some of these people, meaning that there's a lot of crossover, especially when you factor in that Hitler was heavily influenced by the American Confederacy.

Where the Nazis really started showing up in public more was during the energence of the Tea Party, where the Alt-Right basically came out of the closet to join the Republican party.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Yep. The Confederates and the Jim Crow policies of the South were a huge inspiration for the Nazis specifically. If not, our own homegrown fascists. To make a recess analogy. Bigots have always been the peanut butter to the fascist's chocolate. They like them both on their own. But they love them together.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Facism and race "science" has always been the backbone of American conservatism. We are just in a period of time where they are more open about it. And honestly, they might not even be any more open about it, it's just that social media makes it easier to see; legacy media has always been hesitant to call out the right's racism, when when it overt.

The modern Republican party was literally founded on anti-black racism. We've all heard of the Southern Strategy by now, but it was in 1957 that the RNC started "Operation Dixie" which was aimed at recruiting white southern voters (Dixiecrats) away from the Democrats.

By 1970, you have Nixon's GOP strategist saying this,

From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10-20% of the negro vote... the more negroes that register as Democrats... The more the negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes lie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

this is why I don't take seriously anyone who says that both parties are the same or two side of the same coin. maybe you could make that argument 40 years ago. but these days saying that is a shorthand to me that "I don't pay attention to what's going on in the news." clearly one party's mainstream has gone extreme and you have to be willfully ignorant to not see it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Any Republican that would have been interested in a centrist governance framework has been run out by this point.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago

This was true only ~15 years ago. My how things have changed. The Tea Party replaced the old progressives, where like GW Bush even provided government funding to feed the homeless, teach kids, etc. Then even before that finished happening the Alt Right took over from the inside. Now I don't even know what to call the latest movement, although it seems to no longer matter if it is already over and the Alt Right is back in power with Trump at the helm again.

I have heard that the person most single-handedly responsible for the rift before all that was Newt Gingrich, who proposed the hard-line stance of obstructionism, where after that cooperation was seen as weak while before that it was a strength.

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

There's a very good (and very long) article about all the ways Gingrich screwed over American politics. Not just the obstructionism, but the dirty tricks, gaslighting, nonsense propaganda, as well as the shift from actually governing to constantly campaigning during your term, can be laid at his feet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

9/11 deeply affected alot of emotion-first thinkers. It bothered the rest of us quite a bit too, but it hurt them in a way that permanently changed them. It was a major turning point in the GOPs course, since they primarily court emotion-first thinkers votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

white trash hillbilly Nazi bullshit Don't forget that there are plenty of business suit wearing Nazis, as well.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 102 points 9 months ago

Having two of the most charismatic Presidents in American history be democrats only separated by 8 years of the unmitigated failure that was GWB broke the GOP.

Clinton was a southern boy popular with blacks and racist whites alike. The GOP felt they had to go total scorched earth on him they were so frightened.

GWB was so bad he killed an entire ideology. His own brother couldn't even run under his last name he was so toxic.

Obama was black, and the white people in the suburbs loved him. That subversive of 'that natural order' further drove the GOP into insanity.

I can't even get into Trump, who is maybe the perfect reflection of what everyday conservatives have become, ignorant, stupid, and incredibly well off while whining about how they're not well off enough.

[-] shikitohno@kbin.social 44 points 9 months ago

who is maybe the perfect reflection of what everyday conservatives have become, ignorant, stupid, and incredibly well off while whining about how they’re not well off enough.

I wouldn't say they're that representative of a lot of everyday conservatives. A lot of them are doing pretty poorly, but they're ignorant and get pissed off at the idea that anyone else might benefit from a program they personally don't qualify for or disagree with. My father is absolutely convinced that if the Democrats had the political will and ability to implement a wealth tax, that he would somehow be absolutely murdered by taxes on his $10 or $11 an hour he's making at a Winn Dixie in Florida. He's also the sort convinced that welfare queens living it up with brand new cars and designer clothes are not just a real thing, but a common thing that happens that Democrats just don't want people to know about. He'd probably also chalk up his retirement sucking due to what limited social safety net we have in the US, rather than him draining his retirement accounts while he was unemployed before hitting retirement age so he could play golf and go hang at the bar with his buddies even though he was broke. Medicare is his right, though, he worked for that and earned it, but screw these poors under 65 trying to get healthcare with Medicaid. About the only thing he's missing for your average, everyday conservative is an unhealthy dose of religion.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 12 points 9 months ago

He's also the sort convinced that welfare queens living it up with brand new cars and designer clothes are not just a real thing, but a common thing that happens

So where's his new phone and fancy car then? If it's that easy, go out and get your free money, king. Stick it to the Dems or whatever. If Winn-Dixie pays shit then go get on that wonderful welfare. After he buys his new car he should have some money left over to buy some drugs, too, right? That's how they think this works, correct?

Sorry, I guess YOU in particular aren't really the person who needs to hear my scathing sarcasm, but I'm getting really really extremely tired of this viewpoint.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

Having two of the most charismatic Presidents in American history

Lincoln and JFK? No, wait, the two Roosevelts? No, Reagan and Lyndon Johnson? Jefferson and Washington?

If you're talking about Obama and Clinton, sure they were relatively charismatic compared to boring presidents like Bush Sr., Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon. But, US history is filled with very charismatic presidents. Even Bush Jr. was fairly charismatic, that's how he managed to rile up the country to take part in the "War on Terra", and how showing up at ground zero and putting on a hard hat was so important for so many people.

The problem with Jeb Bush wasn't George Bush Jr., it was Jeb Bush. He wasn't very charismatic, wasn't a deep thinker, wasn't a leader, etc. The Bush name isn't toxic among Republicans, it's just that Jeb has even less charisma than Hillary Clinton.

As for what killed the GOP, it's much more complicated than just two somewhat charismatic Democratic presidents:

  • The financial crisis, and how the US focused on stabilizing the banking system without also helping the little people
  • A black president, driving racists to the GOP and making them determined to vote
  • Centrist presidents taking fairly moderate economic policies, destroyed the GOP's image as the party of fiscal responsibility
  • Clinton and Obama not shying away from military solutions to problems made the GOP's image of the hawkish party weak

So, when the GOP was at a period where it was trying to figure out how to define itself, Trump arrived and defined it as the anti-establishment, dog-whistle racist, christian theocratic party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 64 points 9 months ago

The frog in boiling water moment was over a decade ago. They're openly supporting fascists now.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

We never actually de-Nazified after 1945. Between Operation Paperclip, Operation GLADIO, and the rat-lines to Latin America, we just shuffled the Nazi deck chairs on the Nazi Titanic.

In October 1945, in order to constitute a working legal system, and given that 90% of German lawyers had been members of the Nazi Party, the British decided that 50% of the German Legal Civil Service could be staffed by "nominal" Nazis. Similar pressures caused them to relax the restriction even further in April 1946.

This failure to de-Nazify post-war Europe, combined with the need to engage mercenaries and scientists in the ramp up to Truman's war in Korea and the coups in Greece, Albania, and Iran, led to a kind-of global re-Nazification. Former Nazis took power in South Africa, in Brazil, in the newly reconstituted West Germany, and became influence brokers in Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey.

From the Prescott Bush and Thomas J. Watson days of outright collaboration with Fascist Governments to the United Fruit Company rampaging through Latin America to Reagan's Iran-Contra deal, we've been working hand-in-glove with Nazis practically since their inception.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Hey, just like we failed to de-traitor the American South after the civil war! It's almost like you have to pull that bullshit out by the root.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago

MSNBC thinks we’re gonna buy the bullshit framing that this is just now something that needs to be addressed?

Fuckers you’ve been watching this go by for over a decade, and you still want to act indignant. The failure of corporate news to fight trump will not be forgotten. Take your pathetic opinion piece and shove it up your earnings ratio.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

They're right that it was a frog boiling in water situation, except that it started decades ago and the frog has been long boiled

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago

I don't think the boiling frog analogy really applies when the frogs are never going to jump out of the water.

Conservatism is the foundation of nazism. They know it looks bad, so they publicly downplay it. But they still embrace their nazi constituency.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Exactly.

Try to tell a conservative that fascism is a right-wing ideology; they'll reject the premise every time. This is because either:

  • they're playing cryptofascist games and enjoy pissing you off
  • they're brainwashed into thinking evil=left and will never consider any alternative

So they're either on board or a useful idiot. I invite people to try it sometime if they don't believe me.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I get the point of analyzing fascism in logical circles but to discuss the issue with the adherents sounds a bit "lost ball in tall grass" to me.
Who cares what Republicans think of the origins and prior applications of the ideology while they are exclusively leaning into it in the present moment? Frankly it seems like a strange jumping off point to change people's minds or engage in any kind of fruitful conversation.
My two pennies (by way of Ecco I suppose.)

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

My suggestion isn't for the edification of fascists; it's to show leftists that conservatives cannot be honest about fascism.

We're in agreement that it doesn't much matter which option they choose, as the effect is the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 38 points 9 months ago

The phone calls have ALWAYS been coming from inside the house. Because they invited them in...and asked them to bring their friends...

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 38 points 9 months ago

That has been the goal of that movement for at least the last 7 years, to use the chaos of the Trump administration to slowly infiltrate the Republican right. Clearly they have been successful, and CPAC the last few years have been a bellwether of that (e.g. the message: We are All Domestic Terrorists)

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 19 points 9 months ago

Trump did very publicly tell members of the Proud Boys, which is a recognized hate group, to "stand back and stand by". So in allowing Trump to run the party they must also allow in all these wannabe Nazis, as these are his people, his "muscle". He very much sees himself as the mob boss he has always wanted to be, but becoming president allowed him to create this cult that also has no issue answering his calls for violence.

Trump also has no loyalty to anyone, which is irony lost on a man that demands it from everyone else. And I think most in the party know by now that unless you want the cult putting the crosshairs on your back, you better stay in line.

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Trump is really looking forward to the time he has enough power to celebrate his first "accidental" defenestration of a political opponent. That's how you know you've finally made it as a dictator.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

The right isn't a frog in a boiling pot. It's reaching its final form as dictated by the Southern Strategy.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Correct the right is an ignorant thug in a white hood wishing we could have a redo of concentration camps domestically so he can apply to be an SS guard

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Nazis always were in the party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I've been saying that someone has collectively labotamized the republican party for years now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

That frog was hardboiled years ago lol

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
610 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2404 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS