963
it is safe here (lemmy.world)
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago

Entire edifices of philosophy just came crashing down.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"By eliminating private cars and switching to public transportation, the mortality rate due to vehicular accidents has reduced significantly while making the city more efficient and pedestrian friendly. A major ethical delima has been all but solved by doing so."

[-] regalia@literature.cafe 17 points 1 year ago

not until you realize we are all on a very long trolley to inevitable death that is called aging

[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'm enjoying the ride so far

[-] Rotkehle@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

first thing I'm seeing this morning, I'm feeling content :)

[-] Trusting@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is the problem I have with the trolly problem. This website right here.

EVERYONE, and I mean EVERYONE gets hung up on whether you should pull the lever or not. That's not the point of the trolly problem AT ALL.

The point is to consider whether you pull the lever or not, are you responsible for the outcome. It's a question of ethics. You didn't put anyone in this situation, but you have the ability to do something. If you do nothing, are you responsible for the deaths of the four/five/whatever people? If you act and do something, and only one person dies, are you responsible for that persons death, now that you've been an active participant in choosing one over the other?

For anyone still confused how that's not "do you kill one or four people" - think about this very similar, but differently portrayed problem that has the same moral dilemma: You're walking down the street, and you see a homeless person, they're begging for food, you have half of your footlong subway sandwich left over from lunch; but when you pass by, instead of giving them the sandwich, you continue walking, keeping your sandwich for later. That person, unbeknownst to you, later dies of starvation. Are you responsible for their death?

THATS THE QUESTION. not whether you'd pull the lever or not, not whether you would give someone the leftovers from lunch.... the question is literally, ARE YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR KILLING SOMEONE, either by action or inaction. I don't think that anyone would disagree that killing 1 person vs killing 4/5/whatever people is a "better" choice (not a good choice, just one that's less bad). Thus that's NOT the question. The question is, since you didn't CREATE the situation that these people are in, by doing nothing, when you could have done something, are you responsible, and conversely, by doing something, when you could have done nothing, that leads to someone's demise, are you responsible then?

Jesus.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Well, obviously, the dilemma is clear. How do you kill all six people?"

[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No witnesses, no repercussions right?

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

So I would dangle a sharp blade out the window to slice the neck of the guy on the other track as we smush our five main guys.

[-] Agamemnon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

How can you get so worked up about the trolley problem and still completely fuck up the difference between responsibility and accountability?

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Me no word good.

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

That whole site was a lot of fun.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The most horrifying one to me was the number of people who chose to keep their life savings rather than save 4 people.

[-] msage@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Also I would guess most people don't have much saved up in the first place.

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not justifying it but if they have a spouse and a few kids they might consider their long term survival over the immediate survival of strangers.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Money can be replaced, lives cannot. If you wanna be more self-serving, those 4 people would probably be very grateful for what you did and help you get back on your feet.

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I 100% agree. I'm just trying to understand the logic of someone who would choose money over human life. I also suppose some people are just rotten.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It was a large percentage as I recall, around 80%.

[-] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Level 12 fuck. I guess that's modern society for you.

[-] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Huh, an antimeme in the wild

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

(wait roughly 100 years)
All the trolley passengers and bystanders are now dead.

[-] Agamemnon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Canonically, the reader/audience stand-in is Mr. Leverpuller. Am I to assume that he's riding in the tram? To where then? Without a lever for pulling he's now unemployed. He has lost his purpose in life. What's the use of safety, when the destination no longer matters?

[-] Rootiest@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Now Mr Leverpuller receives a basic income from the state and is free to pursue a career or hobby in a field they enjoy without worrying about how they will survive paycheck to paycheck

[-] Agamemnon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Ah... but what when he actually liked the job he was doing? Presenting binary choices with leverthrowing might sound like a strange hobby to have, but I don't judge. Unfortunately, the discarded levers from the scrapyard don't really scratch that itch the same way... they must be connected to something consequential. But without switches to switch Mr. Leverpuller had to get creative: Thus the trolley problem variant with the fat man on a bridge became one of his more infamous later works.

[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

He has now been able to transfer his lever pulling expertise into operating guillotines for the Uber rich.

[-] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The journey is the destination, and what is a better journey than idly sitting on a tram with no appointments in sight?

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'd pull the lever, would you?

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"Why are there sparks coming from that wheel?..." 🤔

[-] Agamemnon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Final Destination 6

[-] rayyyy@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, tell that to Prigozhin.

[-] Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks, I needed that.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Jokes on you, I cut the brakes.

WILD CARD, BITCHES

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The Trolley ~~Problem~~ Solution

[-] CoolBeance@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

What's the answer to The Trolley Problem you say? No. The answer is no.

[-] Sunroc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Hell it's my dream.

That gets me thinking. Isn't it wild how growing up we want to drive ourselves around instead of being passengers? Then if we make enough money we tend to go full circle and want to be drove/flown everywhere by others (or spend the money on something self driving). I suppose the difference is you're still being taken where you want to go.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why did my anxiety levels rise then?

[-] cloudless@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Oddly infuriating.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The fuck cars community especially loves this.

[-] ErinCrush@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
963 points (98.3% liked)

internet funeral

6885 readers
1 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS