14
submitted 1 year ago by Desistance@lemmy.world to c/evs@lemmy.world
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If they don't use some of that market capital to essentially subsidize the price of their EVs to very competitive prices, they are toast. Their first model has earned a bad reputation, whether it deserves it or not, the damage is done. That 2nd model they plan on releasing better be at least $5k cheaper than competing brands with better specs or they will never gain traction in the US market.

[-] jmiller@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

As much as I welcome new EV manufacturers, I am not upset about this. Their mandatory "battery subscription" business model is terrible for consumers, and I hope it dies in the cradle.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS