183
submitted 7 months ago by testeronious@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zweieuro@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago

I really think it's disgusting to boldly claim this is just to protect children. Then get the proposal denied with very valid reasoning that everyone's privacy would be compromised.

And then, a few months later, they have the exact same argument again with the same proposal as before... This seems deeply disrespectful of the subject matter

It feels like a someone is trying to steal a cookie from a cookie jar, but when mum said no you just try again the exact same way...

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 17 points 7 months ago

It literally harms children. The EFF has done a good job explaining this

[-] somerandomname@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They have a lot of articles about this but here's a recent one in the kid's own words saying why they believe such legislation is harmful to them

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/thousands-young-people-told-us-why-kids-online-safety-act-will-be-harmful-minors

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

hasn't some EU entity just ruled that it's illegal?

edit: yeah https://tuta.com/blog/chat-control

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Niceties like the rule of law and human rights are merely suggestions to oligarchs and surveillance capitalism.

"Remember, terrorists and pedos exist, so we need to abandon any presumption of privacy and monitor everyone's activity 24/7... For your freedoms!"

the oligarchy, including the wealthiest terrorists and pedos in history

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

all of this

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 33 points 7 months ago

We have to fight them back every time. They only have to get lucky once.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 31 points 7 months ago

This is why you codify the right in the constitution.

Its the same reason France just added abortion rights to their constitution. They want to makes sure the right is explicit and will never be under threat like this

[-] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 18 points 7 months ago

Its so obvious that ireland, one of the perpetrators of the double irish with a dutch sandwich corpo tax evasion scams, is trying to push for surveilance. That way they can crush any dissent against corpo world rule. Fucking numbnuts.

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago
[-] RatBin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

this destroys our digital privacy of correspondence. Despite lip service being paid to encryption, client-side scanning is to be used to undermine previously secure end-to-end encryption in order to turn our smartphones into spies – this destroys secure encryption.

We'll be moving towards local storage + local hard drives backups, since anything that goes through a server or a chat service seems to be under attack. Also fuck the Irish government.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
183 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

31919 readers
662 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS