175

Ideas to build a federated StackExchange alternative (ioc.exchange)

submitted 6 months ago by lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15471632

Codeberg was asking about this. The linked toot by a commenter points to :

SEqlite

These are CC-BY-SA 4.0 remixes of the Stack Exchange Creative Commons Data Dumps. 100% Unendorsed by Stack Exchange, Inc.

They are minimal. They provide the data you probably care about and the data you need to comply with the original license in SQLite format.

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 31 points 6 months ago

There is a Foss alt already https://www.codidact.com/

Maybe just supporting federation feature for it?

[-] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

I would prefer this. And even without federation it's a very good Stack Whatever replacement already.

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think it would make sense to have a specialised forum for it. The question & answer format requires data that Lemmy just isn't able to fully replicate as it is.

Also the community editable nature of stack exchange is really unique and more like a wiki than a standard forum/branching discussion threads, where we're presumed to have sole ownership of all of our posts.

[-] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Seems like it would be good to request Discourse and NodeBB to offer similar features

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

Wait what i didnt know about any community editable aspect, can you share some examples?

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago

Basically any member is allowed to edit anyone else's question or answer. The changes may go up before or after review by mods depending on the member's trust level. I've had my questions changed before. It can be kind of annoying but I understand they're doing it to maintain some level of quality.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

Is that the only difference? That feature doesn’t seem great tbh. I’d love a wiki on lemmy though especially one that integrated to the point you can one click add a question + answer directly to the communities wiki

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

No, there are a number of differences. There's questions & answers under which there are comments, and a bunch of other functionality. It's so different to a standard threaded forum that you may as well build a new system from scratch. I honestly think it would be less work than trying to shoehorn lemmy into this role, and have another fediverse ecosystem built around it.

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

👍 Interesting idea.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 months ago

People who are looking to start a SE alternative but start with the idea of importing the original SE data dumps are already Doing It Wrong. Much of the issue that has led to the desire to fork SE comes due to the license of the posts and content, which lacks the NC (NonCommercial) component of Creative Commons. Without that component, any attempt to make a Fediverse alternative just ends up in Yet Another Endpoint that can be freely siphoned for data by corporations, for AIs, etc.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Or used by people in any commercial product. Is there really enough people to justify a info exchange of just hobby projects?

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago

See here's the thing: Creative Commons is not an exclusionary license. If I want to make commercial use of something that has a CC-NC license, I explicitly can ask the author for a secondary license limited to the usage and scope that I need. The important thing here is that the author still retains control, as well as a data point of who is profiting from their stuff and how.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

So if someone wanted to use this for work they would have to have an issue, find an answer, contact a person, and hope they can use the thing they just found to their problem?

Like, who wants that?

Heck I don't want every person on here who found something I said useful to be hounding me about using my code either.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Like, who wants that?

Have you literally missed out on the fact that the protest is happening? The protest is certainly not because SO answers are bad.

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

They have already access to SO's CC content, why would they get it from the fediverse?

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

They already have it.

I said alternative to SO. As in, likely, a place to post new content (answers, comments). Nothing can really be done with the content OAI already got their hands on other than firing off a few well-placed EMP bombs.

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, but you mentioned importing old content is problematic, and I don't see why?

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Because to import old content, you have to respect the old license (or get every contributor of back-then to relicense). That would mean having a site with contents under differing licenses depending on date, which is something the corpos can use as an excuse to continue siphoning everything without consequence.

I'm fine with a mirror / archive of SO. But it shoudl very definitively be a different thing than an active SO alternative, and their users and data storages should be also different.