this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
79 points (91.6% liked)

Science Memes

15907 readers
2588 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] sukhmel@programming.dev 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not quite sure what is being conveyed here, but these "nothingness = -0" and "universe = โˆž" give me strong pseudoscience vibes ๐Ÿ˜… maybe the dynamic equilibrium is supported by an ether wind or something

[โ€“] fossilesque@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] sukhmel@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, although both timescales and events in that article make me depressed ๐Ÿ˜…

[โ€“] sundray@lemmus.org 4 points 1 year ago

Frankly, I think the "Degenerate Era" has arrived a little early ๐Ÿซค

[โ€“] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this does not take into account quantum foam.

[โ€“] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or those quantum foam parties in South Beach.

[โ€“] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

If you get quantum foam you must be pouring it too fast.

[โ€“] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We end where we begin, in nothingness

[โ€“] Heavybell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This looks like nonsense, but what do I know? In any case I prefer not to think about it. :P

[โ€“] knorke3@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

But can we actually prove that Universe and Nothingness are not actually the same group?

(Context: P vs. NP)