54
submitted 1 year ago by rikudou to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one

The article is AdGuard centric but it sheds light on the whole process where Google suddenly decided to ban ad blockers.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Because Google is an ad company. /article

[-] autotldr 20 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At the time, there were a number of apps on Google Play that offered content filtering functionality, such as AdAway, AdFree, Ad Blocker, and AdBlock Plus.

In 2016, Google tweaked its developer policy to clarify what actions are prohibited, and for the first time directly named ad blockers as a target.

After AdGuard for Android, which filters traffic for all apps on your device, could no longer be distributed through the Google Play Store, we had to find another way to reach our users and provide them with updates.

The increased visibility this store provides would allow us to introduce the app to more people who can block ad-based tracking, thereby protecting their privacy.

The reality is that most casual users install apps exclusively from the Google Play Store, and that means they are currently missing out on a chance to protect themselves from trackers and ads.

We hope that Google will change its stance and give people the choice and tools to protect themselves from pervasive tracking technology and invasive advertising.


The original article contains 1,019 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

We hope that Google will change its stance and give people the choice and tools to protect themselves from pervasive tracking technology and invasive advertising.

"Unlikely" would be an understatement in terms of Google ever being accepting of adblockers. That web attestation/DRM stuff is really telling

[-] keeeener@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I mean to be fair, Google is considered an ad company, they aren't going to promote things that would make them potentially lose money to themselves

[-] silentdon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Google is ~~considered~~ an ad company.

Fixed that for you

[-] Tibert@compuverse.uk 8 points 1 year ago

This is very old news. But I guess it's never too late to make a copy article for advertising...

[-] rikudou 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, old news, but I still found it interesting and relevant.

[-] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

save reason why Target doesn't sell Amazon cards

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago
[-] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Such a shocker.

[-] bug@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago
[-] rikudou 4 points 1 year ago

You do. If I disable my ad blocker on my home network which blocks ads on the DNS level, many ads slip through. For example those, that are on the same domain as the content.

[-] bug@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~So if you disable the thing I suggested, there are ads. Then... don't?~~

Edit: I misunderstood what you meant

[-] rikudou 1 points 1 year ago

No problem, I can now see that my wording could have been a little clearer.

[-] Saki@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago

Ever heard of Web Environment Integrity (WEI)? Do some research, or perhaps read comments to the actual commit (scroll down). Currently, the general situation seems rather grim.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16263 readers
5 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS