33
submitted 1 year ago by jordanlund@lemmy.one to c/portland@lemmy.ml

Not a fan of Fox, but there are stats in this article that are worth noting and I didn't see them in the others.

Copy/pasta if you don't want to give them the click, bolding is mine:

PORTLAND Ore. (KPTV) - The Portland City Council passed an open-use drug ban Wednesday with a unanimous vote.

The ordinance won’t alter BM 110, which was passed by voters in 2020 and decriminalizes the possession of hard drugs and will go into effect as soon as it’s authorized by the Oregon Legislature or a court approves the ban.

While there’s already an ordinance to ban drinking alcohol in public, the new ordinance would add controlled substances. Those who violate the ordinance could face a fine up to $500 or spend six months in jail.

During public testimony, local business leaders from across Portland expressed their frustrations in how drug use has affected them.

Jeff Miller, CEO of Travel Portland, says in 2019 hotel occupancy was 85-90% in the summer. Now four years later, occupancy is at 63%. Miller says he believes the decrease in hospitality is linked to drug dealing and usage.

“Most cities rebook 70% of those conventions in Portland. We’ve rebooked 30%. They said we’re not coming back. Portland is too dangerous,” says Miller. “If leisure in business travel do not come back you as a city, and we as an organization will see those revenues dropped dramatically.”

David Friedericks of Portland Fire & Rescue Station 1 says his station alone responded to a total of 76 overdose calls over Labor Day weekend and calls the high volume of calls is disheartening.

“In some cases we treat the same patient in the same week. And we know through our partners of AMR, that the same patient has overdosed multiple times in a day,” says Friedericks. “I know that even when we try to help, our help is unwanted, wares on all of us.”

Tony Vezina of 4D Recovery Services says he doesn’t think the ban will be efficient.

“It may just kind of hide addicts. I was an addict; I was on the street before I had to hide,” says Vezina. “It may create a limited intervention that is only applied to people we can see in downtown Portland smoking in front of businesses using fatal or high addictive drugs.”

Vezina believes there needs to be a sensible intervention and bring in additional resources to prevent people from getting addicted provide treatment are and provide long-term recovery support.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Thank you Portland for trying to find a humane alternatives to putting everyone in prison when what they need is help.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

While I agree with you, they never ended up getting them help. So now they’re smoking on my doorstep—literally—and they still have no resources.

You can have the drugs. You can do they drugs. But if you do them and someone can see you—jail. What did we give all those tents out for?

[-] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Definitely need some course correction. The current solution isn’t tenable, but I’m hopeful for better outcomes.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

When? Next decade? They’re not doing anything. Absolutely nothing.

  • Make drugs legal.
  • hand out tents
  • allow people to park makeshift trailers on residential streets
  • ignore all pleas from locals to get git rid of meth labs and homeless camps outside their homes
  • stop responding to 911 calls pretty much at all (try calling 911. Lmk how long it takes)

Whatever I can go on and on.

I get that Portland is trying not to fuck with the people at the bottom, but if they don’t do anything, that’s all they’ll have left.

I say this as I browse for housing outside of Oregon because I’m sick of mentally ill drug addicts screaming out all night long as they wander the streets around me.

[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This was the biggest problem I had with decriminalized drug use, Portland did not have the infrastructure to support people when the bill was voted on so instead of helping people we just made neighborhoods more dangerous for people.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Those who violate the ordinance could face a fine up to $500 or spend six months in jail.

These two are always so disparate. Do they think that someone who can't afford $500 only makes $1000 per year?

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
33 points (88.4% liked)

Portland

975 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS