27
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

So he not only went back into the lion's den for his hat, he's going back yet again for his coat.

Starting to think this dickhead gets off on being called a rapist...

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Lol makes me wonder who's paying his legal fees ? Please tell me its not the taxpayers

[-] maculata@aussie.zone 8 points 5 months ago

He’s SUCH a creep. I’m not even sure why he projects this but he does, not to mention all the testimony against him.

Can anyone explain his inherent creep factor?

[-] gumnut@aussie.zone 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well he used to work as a tobacco lobbyist, and he was happy to get Channel Seven to buy him drugs, sex and a fancy apartment.

The overall picture has telltale signs of an entitled, narcissistic, selfish creep. But hey, maybe I only see him like this because Lisa Wilkinson told me to.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago

Who is paying for it?

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 5 months ago

Oh great. It was weird to have a few weeks of news without Bruce or Brittany stealing the front page.

[-] autotldr 1 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann has lodged a notice of appeal with the Federal Court after a ruling that on the balance of probabilities he did rape Brittany Higgins at Parliament House in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann had tried to sue Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson for defamation over an interview with Ms Higgins on The Project, in which she alleged she was raped.

His defamation case was launched last year and last month ultimately failed, when the Justice Michael Lee found Network Ten had proved its truth defence.

Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said in his judgment he was satisfied to the civil standard of proof that Mr Lehrmann did rape Ms Higgins in the office of Senator Linda Reynolds.

In his judgment Justice Lee referenced the fact that Mr Lehrmann had already been through a criminal trial for the alleged rape in the ACT Supreme Court.

The total costs in Mr Lehrmann's failed defamation case are yet to be determined, but earlier this week the court heard Ms Wilkinson was seeking $1.8 million from Network Ten.


The original article contains 309 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 42%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3579 readers
55 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS