AWOL_muppet

joined 2 years ago
[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 weeks ago

And it's a brutal harvest, too - these clowns deserve everything they get.

180x the limit?! That's appalling

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Go fishieries officers!

I wonder what the fine will be? 2 slices of fuck all due to a promising rugby career or something, no doubt

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I see what their getting at...

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

Nicola Willis' body count is going to be amazingly high by the time their term is done (not sure if that should include restructured people that got a job elsewhere)

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My team members are already indicating they're back which surprises me.

It was so broadly impacting across companies and locations I thought of would have been really deep in the core routing - but resolved after a couple of hours

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rad! I'd love to get down there again

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

Good point - I was all focused on 'the landlord subsidy' but this is a bit more nuanced

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

I'd pay to see that

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a bunch of shit cunts... Let's just further screw over previously recognised 'essential' workers to gloss over our own mistakes

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago

Its the landlords I'm pissed about

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago

I love that there's some bright sparks tackling this from a different angle!

Policy is one thing buy the more novel approaches the better. Good on them!!

[–] AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I never understood not liking them, it always shocks me that my feelings aren't shared...

More for me, I guess

 

I'm wanting to see more well-rounded policy that can be supported by the major parties regardless of 'who floated it', hoping for better enduring government rather than this 'rip and replace' bullshit.

Obviously with the right wong think tanks invading, this is nothing more than a thought exercise, but i reckon its worth exploring.

My heretical angle is significantly reducing thenterms that parties have in power - not extending to 4 years but instead reducing to 1 or 18 months. The thinking being: If you cant get anything done because the only work one is interested in doing is ideological nonsense that caters to a narrow part of society maybe it shouldn't get off the ground in the first place?

 

This sounds like an amazing development for them

 

While I'm never excited about these general uses, it seems like they did a reasonably good job with this experiment. Hopefully other Dept's don't just loosely 'throw it in'...

Some tidbits:

The AI operated on a fixed dataset. It did not collect information, nor did it tap into the main client record systems, so privacy risks were low.

It did not learn from the queries staff made or the information they used with it, and did not add that information to its learning banks, the reports said.

The two tests - first with 25 staff, then with 300 - found that along with boosts to service came gains in employee wellbeing, such as helping people with ADHD or poor hearing focus more in meetings, or those with dyslexia to revise content.

 

I was curious to hear what people think of the telecom breakup into chorus (and wasn't there a third party as well?) after all these years?

I was working there at the time, so some of the staff training was entertaining. I felt like they seemed to be on board with the general thrust of the changes, which I was a little surprised about (I expected a little more lip-service, I guess?)

Has it been a good change? I feel like the national fibre has been great but that's not actually related (but may have relied on the breakup as a precursor?)

 

What got me the most was:

"I am really comfortable with asking government agencies to consider, are there ways that you can innovate to deliver the same level of service while taking less taxpayer dollars to do it."

"In fact, that should be how we conduct ourselves every day, not just in the lead up to a Budget"

Honestly, we've been doing that every year for decades, now!

view more: next ›