AceTKen

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This may seem weird, but I'm weird, so here goes. I rewrote the article with your suggestions as I felt the exact same thing you did about the lack of substantive arguments in it. And no, I didn't use AI. Apologies in advance for Lemmy fucking up the formatting.

I ordered a burger last Tuesday, and it was blue.

"Why is my burger blue?" I asked, innocently.

"Oh! We're making all of our food blue, all the best restaurants are doing it now." the waiter explained.

But I didn't want my burger to be blue. I like my burgers to be the same reliable dark brown colour cooked meats are supposed to be. I'd read in the news recently that there's a lot of innovations being made in blue food colouring, and the taste is nearly undetectable. I knew the food colouring was there, and if you'd asked, I'd say there definitely was a hint of unpleasantness, but we've all had bad burgers before, and I just assumed the chef was having an off day.

Sometimes humans make mistakes like that.

A week later, I poured myself a glass of milk from a carton I had just opened. The milk was blue.

I called up the milk company.

"Oh! Of course, we make blue milk now. It doesn't affect the price in any way, but now the milk is blue."

I tried it and it tasted wrong. I poured it down the sink.

My friend called me crazy. He said that I just have to get used to food being blue now. Everyone likes blue food better, or, at least, it's not really any worse than the non-blue food if you don’t think about it too much. The blue is free, so why would I complain?

"I just think it tastes weird." I explained, fruitlessly.

"I can't tell the difference, and most people say it's just fine for food to be blue."

But I didn't want my food to be blue. Was that so hard to understand? Even if they made the food colouring completely tasteless, I still didn't want it to be blue.

In investor calls, the massive company making the blue food colouring had disclosed that in order to design it, they had to steal every recipe book both private and published. It’s okay though, they say copyright doesn’t apply to them; they have the money to make sure it doesn't.

If added to food (and especially when added to specialty food), the blue food colouring could spontaneously make a food taste almost like someone’s personal family recipe without their permission. Well, the family recipe mixed with blue, anyway.

It's been a year now.

A year of food gradually turning more blue. The price of my (blue) milk went up. They blamed it on inflation and innovations they've made in milk jug technology. The blue milk now comes in a very fancy new (and very blue) package.

The company that made blue food colouring had made it almost completely flavorless, and once all the food distributors got used to including it, the price of it skyrocketed. Rival blue food colouring companies had come up, and some existing food additive businesses had shifted their focus almost entirely to producing blue food colouring. It is a shame, honestly. I quite enjoyed other flavors, but nobody bothers to make them anymore.

Once blue food waste occurs and things are washed down the drain or composed, it gets into the water supply and starts feeding back on itself, making food taste worse and worse.

The companies manufacturing it also let slip that production of blue food colouring takes so much energy that they were bringing coal power plants back online and polluting hundreds of times more than previously. But at least it was easier to make something taste blue! Now things that previously tasted abysmal just tasted bad to mediocre instead! I complain to my friend about this, he nods in agreement and serves me a plate of blue pasta while handing me a bottle of Anti-Blue made as a byproduct of blue food colouring. If you add it to your food, it’s supposed to cancel out the blue. It sometimes works and the blue is less obvious, but the food still always looks and tastes wrong.

Two years in, and I broke.

"Why the heck is my salad blue?" I had been looking forward to this salad. In last year, I had become a picky eater. I was sick of eating blue burgers and making blue chicken sandwiches. At least they couldn't make the leaves blue.

"Please don't speak to me like that, sir. I just serve the food." They had a point.

"I'm sorry. But do you serve anything that isn't blue?" I asked, meekly. I was embarrassed at myself. I try to be polite to staff. They're paid less than minimum wage most of the time. They didn't deserve to be the focus of my ire.

They pointed me to the disclaimer in the corner of the menu.

"We are a blue-first company!" It helpfully explained.

"All our food contains some amount of blue food colouring, but you can ask the chef in the back to remove it if you'd like".

I asked. The chef looked annoyed.

It's now the third year of Blue Food.

I stopped eating out. I've started making my own food at home. It's a lot more effort, and it's not always as tasty as something made by a professional chef, but at least it's not blue. They say there's no way to tell now. You could just close your eyes and you'd not even know! But I know. I can tell. It doesn’t look or taste right. I don’t know how anyone can’t tell.

There have been studies reporting that foods containing the blue food colouring completely lack any expected nutritional content, and when a blue food does contain nutrition it’s just a random accident of the process. We’ve also have other studies stating that people eating exclusively blue foods are not only malnourished, but that their body can no longer process normal foods as efficiently as before.

I rant about it to friends. They nod politely.

One day a friend offered to make me some "normal" food. It seemed fine, tasted okay. Only slightly off. I chalked that up to technique.

Until they revealed that they'd secretly put blue food colouring in it. I'm such a fool, see! Where's the problem? Sure, there's ethical, mental, and environmental concerns with blue food colouring, but one bite of a secretly blue apple isn't burning down the forests, so why even bring it up?

They're not a friend anymore.

So now we're in our third year of blue food colouring. It's in the water now. I can't avoid it. I can't even shower now, as blue food colouring comes out of the taps. I make my own food but “advancements” in knives mean that even my homemade food is a little bit blue. Why do knives need to make things blue? So companies can say that their investment in blue wasn’t wasted and every time you cut something with a knife, it counts as an interaction with blue.

Therefore you want blue (they tell us). We all do (they insist). Why else would we use it?

And me? It's become my full-time job to avoid blue wherever I can and I've resigned to the fact I cannot escape it.

And I still don't like the taste.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would absolutely like an invite!

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, they were never independent. They were owned by CBS prior to that, and before that they were owned by Red Ventures, and originally Whiskey Media.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Not always! Giant Bomb going independent recently is one example.

... It's just mostly bad.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's fair, but comics like the above (which are endemic to this sub) aren't about the extremes and are about standard human behaviours.

It'd be like someone seeing me double check the door lock at my house and saying "You must have OCD."

I also find it mildly concerning that someone may see these memes / comics and self-diagnose themselves with a mental illness that they do not have since self-diagnosis (and wanting to belong to a group) is a massive issue in the internet age.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's been my exact response. So many things here are just... normal human behaviours.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Quite the opposite in fact!

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just learned that the intent for that level is to pause the game and switch which turtle you're playing because they get a full health bar when you do.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Monty Python - Life of Brian

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Now bring Jeff back and make him play Mario Party.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

God damn... just now while I was watching YouTube killed the playlist and then the whole account! WTF?

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sequel? Modern Disney? Oh fuck...

8
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We're back! We're testing the waters with the new influx of people to see if this is valuable or not. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you'd like to help out.

This weekly thread will focus on The Future Of The USA. You may not be American (I'm sure not), but what happens with America can impact the world.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • How do you feel things are going there?
  • How are they impacting relations with your country if you aren't from America?
  • Do you think things will get better or worse?
  • How do you think things could be made better?
  • What should other countries do to mitigate the damage that may be occurring?
  • What are your thoughts on tariffs?
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We're testing the waters with the new influx of people to see if this is valuable or not. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you'd like to help out.

This weekly thread will focus on games (board or video) that are fantastic, but have one extremely annoying aspect that doesn't fit, doesn't make sense, or makes the game worse.

No starters this time as there's tons of examples. Let me know yours and maybe what you did as a workaround or house rule (if applicable)!

10
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We're back! We're testing the waters with the new influx of people to see if this is valuable or not. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you'd like to help out.

This weekly thread will focus on Political Purity Testing. The definition we will use for this discussion is here along with some real-world examples.

The attitude can essentially be summed up with "If you're not 100% with us, then you're against us."

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Do you feel it is helpful or harmful to a side of an issue to purity test?
  • Do you feel these tests are encountered more as you enter extreme areas of thought?
  • Are there alternatives to purity testing that you'd rather see implemented?
  • Do you feel this happens more on the left or right wing, or is it roughly equal?
  • Here's a goofy quiz about which Canadian Political Party you most agree with. Take it and let us know the results if you feel like it! https://canada.isidewith.com/political-quiz
18
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on Helping Us Fix Weekly Topics. This Community seems to have a problem. I generally do my best to create open-ended topics that don't lead the reader to respond in any specific way, all while providing what I think are interesting starters. I've purposely picked other moderators that do not think the same as I do on many topics, but have the skill to explain why they feel the way they do. Results of all of this seem to be extremely limited.

If I try and introduce some opinion in a topic for people to pick at (even if I don't believe it), they tend to get very aggressive and seem to insult moreso than discuss. They focus on moral arguments instead of logical ones and abandon discussions when challenged which sort of defeats the purpose (and goes against the rules) of the entire Community to begin with.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Can we do anything with moderation or rules to help encourage you to respond more?
  • Are there any format changes you'd like to see that may help?
  • Do you ever feel that Lemmy is a more aggressive form of social media and therefore limit your discussion?
  • Does the activist nature of Lemmy help or hurt further adoption?
  • What topics would you like to see covered?
  • Is Lemmy even a good platform for discussion to begin with?
  • Would you like to be a mod and help out?
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on Climate Change. We're not going to discuss if it exists (it very obviously does), but what we can do. I've seen a lot of blame thrown around, but not much on what can actually be done so I'd like to get some ideas on that front.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Should the focus be on individual actions or holding corporations accountable for their environmental impact?
  • Should governments prioritize investment in renewable energy over fossil fuels, even if it means higher short-term costs?
  • Is it more effective to implement strict climate change laws or to rely on voluntary measures and market-driven solutions?
  • Should countries be obligated to accept climate refugees displaced by environmental changes?
  • Is geoengineering a viable solution to combat climate change, or does it pose too many risks?
  • Should climate change education be mandatory in schools worldwide?
 

I tend to browse /All and by New on Lemmy. I went to respond on a thread on !vegan@lemmy.world to thank someone for a recipe that looked good, and found out I had been banned.

Odd, considering I hadn't posted to that sub at any point in the past. I checked the modlog to find that "Mod" had banned a bunch of people citing "Rule 5."

Their Rule 5 states: Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future (see current stickied discussion).

I (and hundreds of others) seemingly broke rule 5 of this community without ever posting there. What is going on?

And my apologies if this isn't the place for this, but I had no idea where else to post the question.

20
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on the sometimes painful art of being wrong.

I don't mean not having an opinion and then forming one, I mean having an opinion, and then having that opinion changed with new or more accurate information.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • When was the last time you were wrong? What about something somewhat major?
  • What was it regarding?
  • How did it make you feel?
  • What do you feel is the best way to correct someone with an ingrained opinion?
  • Is it easier online or in person?
  • When do you give up on talking to someone?
  • Would you be open to a new thread type here where we create a Steelman post as a group? (eg. We start from questions and end up at THE post / article for finding information on a touchy subject)
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on debate, discussion, and the lack thereof on social media (including Lemmy).

My apologies for "leading" a bit more than I try to normally in these weekly threads, however this is a topic that pisses me off in particular. Not only as a mod of a discussion-based community, but as someone who loves it when someone challenges me and proves me wrong / disproves my logic so I'd very much like to hear outside opinions on the topic. I can't even partially understand how people don't want to have a more cohesive / logically sound opinion.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Do you feel that discussion is worse now? If so, what caused it? If not, where may others get this feeling from?
  • Is it potentially a platform issue, or does it happen everywhere?
  • Does discussion even matter any longer? Why or why not?
  • Do you feel that more could be done to encourage discussion with outside views or are we better off just "bubble"-ing ourselves and blocking everyone we disagree with?
11
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on the word "Woke" and its meaning, use, and misuse.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • What does the word mean to you?
  • Is it applied correctly or incorrectly?
  • Is it even applicable any longer?
  • Do you feel that Conservative media misapplies it, and is "everything I don't like is woke" an appropriate sentiment or simply uncharitable?
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on words, their import, and their use / misuse.

With respect to the late, great George Carlin.

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • How do you feel about political (or forced) movement of language? For example, pro-life and pro-choice being two sides of the same issue because nobody wants to identify as "anti-"anything.
  • What are some words that are nebulous, but everyone "knows" the meaning of?
  • Are there any manipulated words that annoy you?
  • Do you find any common patterns with how words are used by various groups?
4
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on getting other people to watch movies we love, but others may not have seen or even know about.

In order to make a recommendation or two, simply let others know an appropriate amount about a movie and why they should give it a chance.

If you want to deeply discuss one, please remember to use Spoiler tags where applicable!

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Great bad movies
  • Hilarious garbage for a big group movie night
  • Best genre movies
  • Underrated films
 

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This weekly thread will focus on the phrase "The Cruelty Is The Point", which may take some explanation.

Frequently on Lemmy (and elsewhere), I see the phrase in comment threads. In my experience, it has been referencing any policy that is contrary to a Liberal or Leftist belief that the thread discusses. I have found the phrase when discussing trans issues, housing, taxes, healthcare, abortion, and many more.

This does not mean it doesn't exist elsewhere, it is simply where I see it since I spend much of my social media time on Lemmy. If your experience differs, please let us know!

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

  • Do you believe this? If so, why?
  • Is it true / false in some or all scenarios?
  • Is it with certain groups or regarding certain things?
  • Do you feel that speech like this is conducive to fixing societal issues?
  • Is what is considered "kind" always the best course of action?
view more: next ›