[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

United States of America v. Ramiz Zijad Hodzic et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, No.4:15CR49CDP/DDN, 9 May 2018

Lawful combatants enjoy “combatant immunity” for acts of warfare, including the wounding or killing of other human beings, “provided those actions were performed in the context of ongoing hostilities against lawful military targets, and were not in violation of the law of war.”

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Trails court does. You obviously didn't read the ruling. We have nothing to discuss.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Does it? I see one example that isn't violent.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Funny how as soon as Democrats think they have some unlimited magic power all they can come up with is killing their political rivals.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It is a fundamental misunderstanding and mistake to believe that people don't vote the way you want them too is because they are less intelligent than you.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You assumed wrong, as the supreme court said the trails court will determine what is and isn't an official act. What's the problem?

First responders get immunity while they are doing their duty. Judges do too. What exactly is the problem? Breaking the law CANNOT be an official act.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

First responders have (in some counties had) immunity while doing their job. If grandma needs CPR you don't want a first responder to hesitate to provide that CPR because they might crack a rib and get sued, or worse, thrown in jail.

The president should not be afraid to make decisions in fear of political retaliation, which is exactly what this ruling clarifys.

If the first responder breaks the law they are held accountable. If the president breaks the law they will be held accountable.

This doesn't mean the president can do whatever they want and they are immune from the law. That's ridiculous. The ruling even states that.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Hell yeah my candidate isn't fascist, YOUR candidate is fascist!

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Never once have I said I'm for this.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Based on the incredible hyperbole written in the dissent. Legal expert turned partisan hack quite quickly when they start talking about assassinations.

[-] Akuden@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Or you could run someone who doesn't have their foot half in the grave.

view more: next ›

Akuden

joined 4 months ago