Architeuthis

joined 2 years ago
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Apropos of nothing, I wonder when Uncle Trump's Presidential Pardon Auction House officially opens for business.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If you've convinced yourself that you'll mostly be fighting the AIs of a rival always-chaotic-evil alien species or their outgroup equivalent, you probably think they are.

Otherwise I hope shooting first and asking questions later will probably continue to be frowned upon in polite society even if it's automated agents doing the shooting.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (10 children)

The job site decided to recommend me an article calling for the removal of most human oversight from military AI on grounds of inefficiency, which is a pressing issue since apparently we're already living in the Culture.

The Strategic Liability of Human Oversight in AI-Driven Military Operations

Conclusion

As AI technology advances, human oversight in military operations, though rooted in ethics and legality, may emerge as a strategic liability in future AI-dominated warfare.

~~Oh unknowable genie of the sketchily curated datasets~~ Claude, come up with an optimal ratio of civilian to enemy combatant deaths that will allow us to bomb that building with the giant red cross that you labeled an enemy stronghold.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 23 points 4 months ago

Maybe Momoa's PR agency forgot to send an appropriate tribute to Alphabet this month.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 4 months ago

found it! thanks!

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Same, apart from the stubsack all top posts are 5-6 days old. Wish the choice of sorting algo was persistent.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I could go over Wolfram's discussion of biological pattern formation, gravity, etc., etc., and give plenty of references to people who've had these ideas earlier. They have also had them better, in that they have been serious enough to work out their consequences, grasp their strengths and weaknesses, and refine or in some cases abandon them. That is, they have done science, where Wolfram has merely thought.

Huh, it looks like Wolfram also pioneered rationalism.

Scott Aaronson also turns up later for having written a paper that refutes a specific Wolfram claim on quantum mechanics, reminding us once again that very smart dumb people are actually a thing.

As a sidenote, if anyone else is finding the plain-text-disguised-as-an-html-document format of this article a tad grating, your browser probably has a reader mode that will make it way more presentable, it's F9 on firefox.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This was exactly what I had in mind but for the life of me I can't remember the title.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

why are all podcast ads just ads for other podcasts? It’s like podcast incest

I'm thinking combination of you probably having set all your privacy settings to non serviam and most of their sponsors having opted out of serving their ads to non US listeners.

I did once get some random scandinavian sounding ads, but for the most part it's the same for me, all iheart podcast trailers.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

It had dumb scientists, a weird love conquers all theme, a bathetic climax that was also on the wrong side of believable and an extremely tacked on epilogue.

Wouldn't say that I hated it, but it was pretty flawed for what it was. magnificent black hole cgi notwithstanding.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 16 points 6 months ago

Summizing Emails is a valid purpose.

Or it would have been if LLMs were sufficiently dependable anyway.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

But “It’s Greek to me” goes right back to the Romans.

The wiki seems to say the aphorism originates with medieval scribes and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar.

The actual ancient Romans are unlikely to have had such qualms, since at the time Greek was much more widely understood than Latin, so much so that many important roman works like Caesar's Memoirs and Marcus Aurelius' Meditations were originally written in Greek, with the Latin versions being translations.

view more: ‹ prev next ›