Armand1

joined 2 years ago
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I'm pretty sure I've been using the Simple Gallery app they mention for years.

It looks like it is still open source. However I do see on the Play Store page that their contact details are in Israel.

Play store page for Simple Gallery

The Pro version, the one I use, claims to collect no data at all. Not sure how much I trust that.

Maybe it's time to look for a new gallery app...

EDIT:

The open source code has not been updated since 2023, and neither has the Pro app. However the non-pro app has been updated in 2024.

GitHub page for Simple Gallery, showing a October 2023 release

Play Store page for Simple Gallery, showing an October 2023 release

Therefore, it might be safe to use the open source code version on GitHub, but I wouldn't touch the free one on the play store.

I wouldn't use the Pro version on the play store as you would be funding these companies and they could push an update in the future.

EDIT 2:

As mentioned here, a popular fork of many of these now abandoned Simple apps is the Fossify project. If you liked the app I'd recommend looking at that if you want to keep getting security updates at the very least.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Imagine if that kind of money were spent making people's lives better, instead of deliberately making people's lives worse at no benefit to anyone.

"Government efficiency" my ass.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 83 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

This one hits a little too close to home...

Also, the word you're looking for might be "abusive" rather than "strict".

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This has been posted half a dozen times in the last two months alone. Please. We get it.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32225244

The UK's EHRC recently opened a public review period for their new Code of Practice for following the Equality Act of 2010.

Despite previous claims that this judgement does not reduce trans rights, its new Code of Practice tells a different story.

I spent 8 hours reading through the entire Code of Practice, analysing it and writing up my feedback. Like all the trans people who organized a Mass Lobby over this, I also concluded that this new guidance was horrific. See Trans Solidarity Alliance's guidance on this situation.

Amongst many other dangerous and belittling statements about "biological sex" and how trans people should use services that align with their sex at birth stated throughout the entire thing, it clearly states in Section 13.3.19 that single sex services cannot lawfully include trans people of a matching gender. Asserting that this would amount to discrimination against cis people of the opposite sex.

Picture this: You're a trans person that has suffered domestic abuse. You seek a support group to help you. You find a women's support group friendly to trans women. A gender critical finds out about this, and asks a cis male friend to threaten to sue the support group for discrimination. The support group is forced to make a difficult decision: become trans-exclusionary, leaving you with no support or go to court on the matter.

This EHRC views the complaint by the cis man, here as completely lawful and in following with the Equality Act, an act meant to protect minorities, and urges organizations to not include trans people because of it.

It bases its entire guidance on the idea that trans people are not their acquired gender, and it's ok to pry into and treat them as their birth sex.

 

The UK's EHRC recently opened a public review period for their new Code of Practice for following the Equality Act of 2010.

Despite previous claims that this judgement does not reduce trans rights, its new Code of Practice tells a different story.

I spent 8 hours reading through the entire Code of Practice, analysing it and writing up my feedback. Like all the trans people who organized a Mass Lobby over this, I also concluded that this new guidance was horrific. See Trans Solidarity Alliance's guidance on this situation.

Amongst many other dangerous and belittling statements about "biological sex" and how trans people should use services that align with their sex at birth stated throughout the entire thing, it clearly states in Section 13.3.19 that single sex services cannot lawfully include trans people of a matching gender. Asserting that this would amount to discrimination against cis people of the opposite sex.

Picture this: You're a trans person that has suffered domestic abuse. You seek a support group to help you. You find a women's support group friendly to trans women. A gender critical finds out about this, and asks a cis male friend to threaten to sue the support group for discrimination. The support group is forced to make a difficult decision: become trans-exclusionary, leaving you with no support or go to court on the matter.

This EHRC views the complaint by the cis man, here as completely lawful and in following with the Equality Act, an act meant to protect minorities, and urges organizations to not include trans people because of it.

It bases its entire guidance on the idea that trans people are not their acquired gender, and it's ok to pry into and treat them as their birth sex.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is effectively the plot of Trading Places (1983) starring Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Another common one is "y'all" but I'm not American enough to pull that off.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Someone at work said we should use "folks"... But I'm not a Loony Tunes ending screen.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it's if you want to have user management. There's some sort of admin console you have to pay for, but I don't use it.

To be honest I had kind of forgotten it was a thing. If you're using this for a business then you might want to link it to your OIDC (Microsoft account etc.) and therefore pay for those extra features.

However if you use it to connect to your own devices or those of your friends like you would with TeamViewer (via device IDs and per-device passwords) as I do, you won't have to pay for it.

Give it a go and see how you get on!

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Been using them for years.

It's ~~completely~~ free, open source and has:

  • Unsupervised (for headless servers) or supervised (helping out relatives) access
  • Easily file transfers
  • Cross-copy paste
  • Identification server (what gives out connection IDs) can be self-hosted or you can use theirs for free
  • Can control PCs from mobile app (~~though not vice versa~~ apparently they support this now!)
  • Experimental web browser client.

EDIT: I forgot, but it's also much better at compressing video effectively than realVNC, which is what I used to use. Performance and latency remains fairly good even at low bitrate.

For a little while, I even used to play point and click games remotely with my brother over it. Probably too much latency for an action game though.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

If your kid has half a brain he'll do what we did as kids when porn sites were blocked on the home WiFi: He'll just get a VPN.

And when VPN websites were blocked on the home WiFi, we'd just download their apps on mobile data.

Where there's a will, there's a way.

Better to educate your kids on their natural urges and letting them use the more moderated sites than have them go down the more dodgy rabbitholes. No kink shaming but some of the things people do are nasty.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think they are bundling this into their regular app, so they'd have to put every guardian read on the list😅

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Ok, so it's an encrypted, open source whistle-blowing feature in their app / system.

The article is light on technical details but if it makes whistleblowing easier and safer than for example emailing their editors that's probably a good thing.

127
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

I got the inspiration for this when I was going through all my old images when migrating to Immich.

Left-to-right: A coffee container, A Coke bottle with the label taken off, A pasta sauce jar, a coke can with the top removed with a can opener.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30910548

The UK's Equality and Human Rights Commission, famous for recently trampling on human rights by arresting peaceful protesters, has decided that trans people need to stop complaining about people taking away their rights.

 

The UK's Equality and Human Rights Commission, famous for recently trampling on human rights by arresting peaceful protesters, has decided that trans people need to stop complaining about people taking away their rights.

 

This post reads as 'You have been deemed guilty of aiding the undesirables. You will be punished."

216
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/30622199

Note that I believe this has not been ratified yet, but is set to be voted on this coming week.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29084869

Thankfully, this amendment has been voted down. If I had known about this Lemmy community I would have posted it there. I will post these here from now on 🙂.

Link to a Reddit post by an activist I know.

But to summarise, Amendment NC21 to the Data Use and Access Bill would require sex to be defined as "sex at birth" for all identity verification requests.

This includes people who have changed their sex legally, which will now be separately catalogued.

This means that all kinds of people, including (potential) employers, landlords, government staff etc. will be able to look up these details about you.

This amendment will be voted on on the 7th of May, so if you're in the UK please badger your MP to vote against it (template email in the Reddit post)

 

“Anonymous has decided to enforce the Judge's order since you and your sycophant staff ignore lawful orders that go against your fascist plans,” a defacement message posted to GlobalX’s website reads.

 

Link to a Reddit post by an activist I know.

But to summarise, Amendment NC21 to the Data Use and Access Bill would require sex to be defined as "sex at birth" for all identity verification requests.

This includes people who have changed their sex legally, which will now be separately catalogued.

This means that all kinds of people, including (potential) employers, landlords, government staff etc. will be able to look up these details about you.

This amendment will be voted on on the 7th of May, so if you're in the UK please badger your MP to vote against it (template email in the Reddit post)

683
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Armand1@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 

I got tired of Google shoving AI down my throat in yet another place in my phone.

I'm surprised it even gave me the choice to "report and block".

view more: next ›