BalpeenHammer

How do you know?

Sorry but that's a bit too paranoid for me. As you said currently businesses have to accept cash so why do you need a law that says they have to accept cash? It's already the law. If you ask me this is a dumb requirement. Why should businesses have to accept cash? They aren't forced to accept credit cards of EFTPOS. They should be able to choose any kind of payment they want. If you don't like it go to the next business.

If you make society cashless, if you give businsses the right to be card only, to not handle cash; then most of them wont. You make cash almost useless.

How do you know most of them won't? There are cashless societies out there and most businesses still take cash.

Nobody is trying to make cash illegal.

Finally I am not buying your story about how your friends don't want you pay them in cash. You shouldn't have added that to your list of woes.

Nat voters were all in on Trumpism. David Seymour famously invited his supporters to wear MAGA hats although as usual he was too much of a coward to put one on himself.

This government only does the bidding of the USA and Israel so I am sure this will be shown.

Nobody was trying to make using cash illegal. This is a bunch of insane idiots who all of a sudden decided that using cash was going to be illegal any day now and are pushing this useless legislation in order to appease the flat earthers that are their voters.

American style politics are here now, invited in by the current right wing coalition. No they are not centre right, they are full on right wing.

Maybe we are just bad at being decent, intelligent, rational people.

It's a step towards trump/orban/putin/erdogan/netinyahu style of fascism that the right wing in this country wants to bring here.

No thanks. Stay in your shithole country and fix it if you want. The last thing we want is that for the infection that has already taken hold via ACT and National to spread faster and further.

Why do you think randomly selected citizens who are willing to join such a thing would have a different political ideology than the citizens who vote for these parties?

I don't get it. Citizens elect MPs for this very purpose. There is no reason to think that a group of randomly selected citizens will have a different political outlook than the people they elect into office.

Speak for yourself. I appreciate the added context.