mapcomplete has integration with this site:
I've also seen this project:
mapcomplete has integration with this site:
I've also seen this project:
That's an interesting comment from a guy that used to work for Canonical, and then went anti-snap pretty hard, to the point that he made this:
There's some even older UI bits buried around in there:
This is tilting at windmills. If someone has physical possession of a piece of hardware, you should assume that it's been compromised down to the silicon, no matter what clever tricks they've tried to stymie hackers with. Also, the analog hole will always exist. Just generate a deepfake and then take a picture of it.
Much of the concept of "intellectual property". Here's a good essay by Richard Stallman:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html
Copyright by and large needs to be abolished. Patents in software are nonsensical, and elsewhere they should be drastically scaled back. Trademark is alright, with a few adjustments needed.
But all of the above is hiding behind a concept of "property" that just does not apply to intangible things, and we need to stop using that term to describe them.
You're going to get a lot of comments about Ubuntu and snaps. Definitely one of the reasons I switched away from it.
!datahoarder@lemmy.ml looks active and seems like a good place for it
"Ok class, for the rest of the semester, we're going to use the C89 standard".
I forgot the return 0;
at the end of my main function and lost points on a test. Decided to be a point slut to ensure an A in the class and argued that it's allowed in the C99 standard. The professor sighed and gave me back my points, but next class specified the exact standard he was grading by.
This seems really short-sighted. Why would I go to How Stuff Works when I can just ask the LLM myself?
Maybe there's just no possible business model for them anymore with the advent of LLMs, but at least if they focused on the "actually written by humans!" angle there'd be some hook to draw people in.
Those are dumb fucking patents. I hope Google fights this to the end and gets them invalidated.
The scary temperatures you see in news headlines are basically unaffected by the fires. Wikipedia has a good overview:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surface_temperature
The overall issue with global warming is not that one place gets super hot once and sets a record. Otherwise I could make news headlines by setting my house on fire and getting "hottest temperature ever! (at my house)". Those local hotspots of fire will affect the average global temp only a tiny bit, because the earth is a big place and there's lots of places not currently on fire. The thing to worry about is the reverse actually: because the earth is warming, fires are increasing everywhere, and then everybody will be next to a fire on that blessed record-setting day.
I like this reaction video for the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWUUrdQfjn8