Corgana

joined 2 years ago
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 3 days ago

Lemmy.world for instance could put the rest of the Lemmy fediverse between a rock and a hard place if they wanted to

beehaw.org is doing great, and they deferated from.world a while ago. Your point is correct though, Mastodon.social for example has half of all Mastodon users.

That said- there is little incentive to having a large instance, it costs a lot more and requires a lot more work.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"The fediverse" has no rules, if an instance wants to allow vote manipulation they have that power.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 8 points 3 days ago

The best defense is to call them out on it and then walk away

Yes exactly, I try to just simply describe what they are doing "This account is spreading the false narrative _____ for the purposes of ___" then not replying again. They want engagement because the more back-and-forth bickering that goes on, the less likely a third party reader is going to care to read beyond the top comment (the propaganda) and seeing a lot of replies can also give the impression that the debate is legitimate. Getting into a "debate" with someone "debating" in bad faith only helps them flood the zone with shit.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago

Reddit mods can sniff out astroturfing pretty easily actually, but Reddit inc doesn't do much to stop it. On the Fediverse, admins can simply ban from the instance, and if an instance does a poor job of removing inauthentic content then they can defederate.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

He's not really dead. As long as we remember him.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Block and move on. Don't twist yourself into knots appeasing people, focus on keeping the users you want happy.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not trying to victim blame or anything, but I find it hard to believe that someone operating a low-moderation instance would truly expect people who don't like moderation to stay away.

Don't get me wrong I agree with your sentiment and dislike that behavior, but what I'm saying is that asking or expecting users not to go on witch hunts or to behave in a certain way is a fool's errand that will always lead to burnout. A more sustainable approach for admins and mods is creating space for what they want to host and not trying to control what they don't.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

Yeeeeah that user doesn't really understand how these things work. Hopefully stories like this can get out there because the only thing that can stop predatory behavior by corporations is bad press.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is that from? I didn't see it in the article.

 

Pretty freaky article, and it doesn't surprise me that chatbots could have this effect on some people more vulnerable to this sort of delusional thinking.

I also thought this was very interesting that even a subreddit full of die-hard AI evangelists (many of whom have an already religious-esque view of AI) would notice and identify a problem with this behavior.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago

It seemed fine to me....

....oh my

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

Honestly I'm just glad someone is out there doing this work

 

Thought this was a really interesting read and felt my fellow Website enjoyers might think so too.

 
 
 
 

Very cool to see this topic in a place like Forbes, IMO.

view more: next ›