CosmoNova

joined 2 years ago
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Adding fuel to burning Teslas. What a brilliant idea.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I recently learned that Neurodiversity is an umbrella term. It‘s the concept that both Neurotypical and Neurodivergent people exist and should coexist. Meaning that no single person is actually Neurodiverse because you can‘t be both at the same time. It kind of broke my brain for a moment when I learned this so I hope this doesn‘t make anyone uncomfortable.

But to answer your question: It depends. When all my needs are met and I have a good routine I can be around people for 10 hours a day, 6 days a week easily. Sunday is usually my alone time then. Outside of my routine or when there is barely a routine, it‘s reduced to maybe 5 hours a day around people at best and I need a whole weekend for myself.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

But that‘s literally what this is: A screenshot. What you are describing might be exactly how it transpired.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

B-b-but Lemmy told me they‘re moderate and not far right at all because Sweden is a socialist country and therefore can do no wrong… How could this be? /s

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Knowing Youtube they will start drizzling them into your search results instead or something equally terrible.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Are you trying to be funny or something? Used electric cars aren‘t exactly going up in price. What a bunch of nonsense. Talking about cope.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you drive ~~alone~~ a Tesla, you drive with Hitler

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (14 children)

„Free market“? Speaking of hypocrisy. Chinese car brands are so heavily subsidized they probably cost the Chinese economy more than they make selling them at the moment. China is clearly trying to drown the global market with cheap cars so they can ramp up prices immensely once they have killed the competition and have become a monopoly. China hasn‘t been the extreme low income country to produce super cheaply for a long time and they couldn‘t produce cars this cheap in a free market situation.

Many countries and the EU have measures against such practices because state run operations with the sole purpose to destroy an industry (which this is) undermine the very idea of the free market or even trade relationships.

Alternatively we could start subsiding local car makers and play the same little game China is playing but more cars is honestly the last thing we need right now. Tariffs are a much smoother option to deal with this even when they have a bad rep.

Ideally we use that generated money from tariffs to subsidize public transport so we don‘t get cheaper cars but cheaper alternatives but that‘s still just a dream I‘m afraid.

Whatever the case, one should look at super cheap cars and what that means in the long run more critically.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I as a lifelong coder couldn‘t agree more.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

TIL: The English language is computer code, making me a coder apparently.

view more: next ›