[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was citing the original article where it’s stated. It says it’s increased to match the tolerance of the people who consume 2/3rds of the product not some nonsensical fantasy it’s being done to make it easier to ship.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

Does it really matter that much? You still control your profiles on each actual site it's just an aggregator.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago

They won’t need to build anything there will eventually be mature open source tooling that smaller artists and venues will start using, it’ll gain mindshare and become the standard. Or you can wait for ticketmaster to be included into a cbdc coming to a country near you soon. Going on the on-chain either way but it’d rather we took back control.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

The parasitic middleman.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago

You don’t need it because we have ticketmaster? That’s your argument lol? It’s to prevent the next one.

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

Why would Satoshi do this

[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago
[-] Glasgow@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

They do solve problems though. If there was a simple app that musicians could sell tickets direct to customers, you can loose all the predatory middlemen

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Glasgow

joined 2 years ago