At the time maybe, but a lot of smaller details such as this will become much more important later on when the dust settles. So, why not write it up now so that ot can be revisited later on. It's not as if there's a limit to the number of acticles they can publish.
Well if all you are used to is your establishment talking heads in narrow lockstep then it might be off putting. It isn't at all damning for a single outlet to report on something. Especially when working somewhere so dangerous to be.
In reality this is, as others seem to be at pains to point out, a minor addition to the mountian of nightsoil. It wouldn't make a lot of sense to fabricate such a lightweight appendix if it is likely to undermine reporting on more serious events.
Calling it branding isn't entirely out of scope with the normal usage of the word either. It just is slightly problematic in that we are now conditioned to expect the very worst of humanity from some of the IDF soldiers so our minds expect hot irons.
Writing the number on their foreheads is flat out dehumanising. How is that in any way contentious?
If your local police force rounded up all the males in a minority group and wrote the processing numbers on their foreheads do you think it might make the news?
Actually this was foretold 5000yrs ago in Ireland.
On my Windows Phone silly
How long have you been sitting with that one in your pocket you sage muppet?
I done goofed up. I hit the 'block user' option instead of the 'go to user' option (need glasses) and I can't now find an option to unblock them. Is there one?
To acquire one unpaired valence electron.
I wonder if those totally-bias-free media bias checker sites that folks like to use to discount leftwing news sources have reflected on any of NYT's latest propaganda?
lol nope!
Nothing quite says highly factual democratic socialism (center-left) quite like churning out one sided propaganda for an appartiting, genocidal group of ethnofascists.
That can't be true. I distinctly remember the shark in Jaws: The Revenge roaring. So get your facts straight.
I think this is a bit naive. Both partys will have done their homework and have a fairly good idea what it is those disenfranchised voters want. The problem is is what they want is at odds with what the party's big donors want.