HonoredMule

I don't understand how Israel gets to be so special. I also don't get how any other nation would accept anything less, especially once the deal with Israel proved it (politically) can be done. Technical feasibility shouldn't even be in question.

Well, I guess it's nice that militaries get to "own nothing and be happy" too.

Long before Musk's true character became widely known, this was my primary reason not to get a Tesla. In fact, Tesla's focus on proprietary software and post-purchase access to vehicles marked the sharp end to my favorable opinion of both him and the company.

Back when he was selling his EV vision and struggling to get the roadster into production, it hadn't even occurred to me that someone with such ambitions would build a closed platform. It would just be so out of line with the values supposedly driving him.

Nowadays I think my best shot at getting the sort of EV I want is either doing my own conversion or finding some small operation producing kit cars. But I need a truck or at least something that can haul heavy trailer loads up long hills.

(🧠 Don't say bootlegger, don't say bootlegger.)

It sounds like business is booming for bootleggers right about now.

(🧠 That's it, I quit.)

I had no idea Yupik was Canadian, or for that matter anything more than an Amazon seller. I guess it's time to give their catalog another perusal.

I have no expertise in military technology and cannot speak to the superiority of F-35s, the magnitude of their tactical advantage, nor the factors that justify or mitigate their operating cost. But the auxiliary benefits of buying into Saab's ecosystem are accumulating into quite the stack. Given that our military strength is somewhat predicated on economic strength, I like seeing us take a path that grows both. The latter pays dividends even if we fight no real wars nor avert any theoretical ones.

And ultimately, Lockheed Martin's technological advantage is built on capital investment and mindshare. With sufficient resources consolidating elsewhere, that can be eventually rivaled. Even before that point, we're looking at facing rivals with lesser tech than the Gripen, or rivals that control the F-35 program and its supply lines. The upsides are just too context-sensitive.

Cancer is very dumb, by any metric I can possibly imagine:

• it literally lacks any mechanism for intellect/processing information
• it is a random mutation that renders affected cells dysfunctional
• it has no mechanism to spread to another host, yet still kills the host it has
• it has four different ways that it might just kill itself

This only makes the metaphor all the more apt. Intelligent foes are far less dangerous. You have to be exceedingly dumb to choose mutually assured destruction.

Good.

Let him stick to that line, keeping Canadians angry and trade negotiations stalled. He's helping us maintain the momentum needed to build a stronger Canada and end reliance on U.S. trade for good. When he and his ilk are all eventually deposed, the U.S. will have to make many concessions to get (partially) back into our good graces. If that doesn't happen, our need for political separation will only increase.

No deal is the best deal.

The main thing we'd lose is the autonomy to manage our own economy. Given that's something we've handled especially well resulting in impressive economic stability in spite of global events, it's not a thing to be sacrificed lightly - or at all.

The main benefit of joining the Eurozone is tight economic integration that lets member nations share the larger group's economic stability. That benefit is never going to substantively materialize for a nation physically separated by an ocean. But we'd still be losing the right to decide how many power coupons we print, directly regulate our own banks, and set interest rates/inflation targets.

I'm open to other forms of EU association, but the Eurozone is a solid hell no.

Any reporter who's inclined to ask tough questions and actually given a chance has about three hundred others that hit closer to home for their own electorate. They'll be lucky if they can ask two, and know they're not getting an actual answer anyway.

Henson safety razor. It's the only product I ever purchased based on sponsored recommendations, and I actually didn't regret it. It's hard to clog, easy to clean, and the minimalist design compared to other safety razors helps with tight spaces. The handle's grip pattern works better than you'd think too, without scraping flesh.

After using it for about a year, my partner (who uses razors a lot more and has really sensitive and fragile skin) finally worked up the nerve to try it. Now we have two.

To be clear though, it is a luxury product. You can get a quality safety razor that works just fine for half the price, easily. I probably still wouldn't have grabbed one myself, if it weren't a Canadian product. You can go for the titanium version if you're an utter financial masochist.

Even better. It's an aggregation of links to aggregated links, posted on a link aggregator.

Ah, but who curates the curators. 😛

It's just another example of Canada letting the U.S. dictate our IP laws to their media moguls' benefit, for the sake of trade. These are the things Dumpster does not count in the balance of a deal yet presumes is entrenched even after reneging on that deal.

If the deal is ripped up, it should be ripped up entirely.

We're being gifted more freedom to make sure our own laws are working for us.