Imnecomrade

Yeah it's logarithmic because nobody should need over $2 million. You are stealing exponentially at billions of dollars.

I've been wanting an Ushanka. I already have a silver Lenin bust.

I had a feeling there was a story of Nazis doing this. Thank you for the source.

I have wanted to put original content on PeerTube as well, but it's hard with my computer situation and being busy all the time. I hope to see more comrades posting content on alternative platforms, especially exclusively. I'm worried about loss of educational digital media on private platforms like YouTube and Reddit as enshittification continues. I'm also worried about archive.org. I depend on it greatly. I hope we archive and preserve media as much as possible on other platforms before we inevitably lose them.

Kinda wish I spent more time with my coworkers and tried to work towards a union, even though I was a contractor. Not sure if I would have been successful because my coworkers were pretty right-wing and anti-union. Perhaps after trucking and after I save for and attend school and become an electrical engineer, I will try to talk to my coworkers more, organize board game nights or help support my coworkers when they need help in their personal lives, hopefully build solidarity and community, and eventually educate them and push them towards unionization.

There were some good tips in this blogpost I hadn't thought of, and it would have probably helped me in the past.

First, I am only meaning to provide my perspective, even if it turns out to be not perfect or 100% accurate to reality, and I am willing to be corrected or to learn from others. I'm not just some first worlder set in their ways.

I think you misunderstood some of the points I made, just as I interpreted freagle's point about AI wastefulness to be in a broader sense than it was. I don't believe AI as it exists now in the global capitalist system will liberate the third world. My guess is the ruling class's use of the AI will probably have a greater impact against the working class's interests than the impact the working class will have to counter AI through its own use. We have no control over AI's existence. It's a reality we have to live with. The only way AI would have an improvement on the working class's lives across the entire planet would be for a socialist system to become dominant across the world and the global capitalist hegemony to be overthrown.

I'm not denying the ruling class's use of AI is a much greater detriment to us than any gains we get from the weakening of the labor aristocracy. However, I believe as those people start losing their jobs, communist parties will need to start reaching out to them, educate them, and bring them to our cause so we can develop the numbers and power to overthrow the ruling class, which I believe is the upmost importance. I honestly don't believe most labor aristocrats, especially in the West, will be radicalized until they become proletarianized and their material conditions greatly worsen.

I was just implying after revolution and when we live in a socialist society, we would use AI for productive means and not for these wasteful projects. Your list above are mostly projects in a capitalist society that serve the ruling class's interests.

The only real potential benefit of AI in a capitalist society, besides potentially using it to make tools, services, and content for workers and communist parties to fight back against the system, is the proletarianization and hopefully radicalization (toward socialism) of labor aristocrats as the deepening contradictions of capitalism lead to more unrest amongst the working class.

Wasteful for sure, but I can see it saving someone a lot of time.

Many degrowth proposals call for some aggregate reduction of energy use or material throughput. The issue with these proposals is that they conflict with the need to give the entire planet public housing, public transit, reliable electricity, modern water-sewage services, etc., which cannot be achieved by "shrinking material throughput". According to modeling from Princeton University (this may be outdated), it suggests that zeroing emissions by 2050 will require 80 to 120 million heat pumps, up to 5 times an increase in electricity transmission capacity, 250 large or 3,800 nuclear reactors, and the development of a new carbon capture and sequestration industry from scratch. Degrowth policies, while not intending to result in ecological austerity, effectively do so through their fiscal commitment to budgetary constraints which inevitably require government cuts.

The reason for the above paragraph is to give an analogy to the controversy of "AI wastefulness". Relying on manual labor for software development could actually lead to more wastefulness long term and a failure to resolve the climate crisis in time. Even though AI requires a lot of power, creating solutions faster (especially in green industries as well as emissions reduced from humans such as commuting to work) could lead to a better and faster impact on reducing emissions.

https://tankie.tube/w/9coNT19Q6hT8vLJN93NeNN

I prefer to post invidious links for people's security and privacy. I know it's annoying if it doesn't work for you. Maybe try a VPN or just change the link from "inv.nadeko.net" to "www.youtube.com".