Nice one thanks ๐
Yes I think it's over but I got lost. She's already lost appeals, and if she had more evidence you'd think she'd have called more than just a plumber to give evidence in her defence!
It's being slanted that way in the media to get clicks, but the evidence is massive but dry, boring and hard to follow. It's like:
Lucy's swipe card shows she was in at A time, she was updated computer records at BC and D times, and using her phone at EF and G times. Person H saw her doing I at J time, person K saw her etc etc. It all pinpoints her movements.
There's also many things like Lucy says she could see Child I was pale from 5 or 6 feet away in a darkened room in the below cot, which isn't credible:
And in cross examination about it she said she could see it because "I knew what I was looking for... I mean at".
What kind of outfits? I'm not sure I could make it work
That's what I thought it's so horrible its unbearable. When you look into the evidence against her (not just what was reported in the press) it's overwhelming. Just reading the final few hours of the live feed on her cross examination tells you a lot
That's brilliant! A how to guide for the modern gay written in the past
Sounds good! Hope you have a good chillax
I love her! Nancy is such an iconic figure
Thanks mate! The more I exercise the more I can eat
Ha! Good point. "For now just put these chains on"
Ditto. Why should I sign over my bodily fluids? I don't use drugs, but that's not the point.
๐