Manna need to get quieter drones. People who live beside their base of operation don't like the noise & disturbance.
3
Driving Automation and Transit: Automation could kill transit as we know it, or make it even better
(www.changinglanesnewsletter.com)
Also, if you're reasonably smart and self-motivated the 21st century world abounds with the materials to let you learn much of what you would in college. Not specialized learning maybe, but for generalized learning, yes.
An Irish drone delivery company Manna has been getting lots of complaints, apparently its not much fun living beside its base of operations.
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2025/0820/1529313-drone-planning-dublin/
Won't there be insurance for this?
If companies like FedEx can bear the cost of liabilities for huge numbers of human drivers, doesn't that suggest the burden will be far less for robo-vehicle car companies?
Caveat - China Daily is owned and operated by the Chinese government/CCP. But the article is interesting in itself, and its official endorsement is interesting, too.
I'm still surprised at the rate LLMs make simple mistakes. I was recently using ChatGPT to research biographical details about James Joyce's life, and it gave me several basic facts (places he lived & was educated at) at variance with what is clearly stated in the Wikipedia article about him.
I wonder will the US & EU bifurcate on AI adoption for government and administration, with the EU opting for open-source?
US models don't seem interested in complying with EU law like the AI Act or GDPR.
If so, 5 or 10 years down the line this could lead to very fundamental differences in how the two territories are governed. There may all sorts of unexpected effects arising from this.
The person making this claim, Miles Brundage, has a distinguished background in AI policy research, including being head of Policy Research at OpenAI from 2018 to 24. Which is all the more reason to ask skeptical questions about claims like this.
What economists agree with this claim? (Where are citations/sources to back this claim?)
How will it come about politically? (Some countries are so polarised, they seem they'd prefer a civil war to anything as left-wing as UBI).
What would inflation be like if everyone had $10K UBI? (Would eggs be $1,000 a dozen?)
All the same, I'm glad he's at least brave enough to seriously face what most won't. It's just such a shame, as economists won't face this, we're left to deal with source-light discussion that doesn't rise much above anecdotes and opinions.
Former OpenAI researcher says a $10,000 monthly UBI will be 'feasible' with AI-enabled growth
its eligibility criteria to those with Italian parents or grandparents.
That's the existing criteria for Irish passports. I'd guess the number of Americans with one grandparent born in Ireland or Italy must run to 10s of millions.
In terms of advancing software, its extremely inefficient,
It amazes me how their BS on 'innovation' has infected broader culture and politics.
Look how little fundamental innovation there is in health, education and housing. All getting more expensive and out of reach.
Their hope seems to be to invent something proprietary and hypey that gets them bought up, not to actually build something functional.
They all seem to be chasing the dream of being unicorns (for the unintiated reading this, monopolist giants like Google/Meta, not magical horses).
Do American VCs even bother with start-ups who want to be small/medium sized firms, and have a solid case for making a few hundred million dollars every year?
view more: next ›
Yes, and there is also the possibility that it could be upon us quite suddenly. It may just take one fundamental breakthrough to make the leap from what we have currently to AGI, and once that breakthrough is achieved, AGI could arrive quite quickly. It may not be a linear process of improvement, where we reach the summit in many years.