I'm still surprised at the rate LLMs make simple mistakes. I was recently using ChatGPT to research biographical details about James Joyce's life, and it gave me several basic facts (places he lived & was educated at) at variance with what is clearly stated in the Wikipedia article about him.
I wonder will the US & EU bifurcate on AI adoption for government and administration, with the EU opting for open-source?
US models don't seem interested in complying with EU law like the AI Act or GDPR.
If so, 5 or 10 years down the line this could lead to very fundamental differences in how the two territories are governed. There may all sorts of unexpected effects arising from this.
The person making this claim, Miles Brundage, has a distinguished background in AI policy research, including being head of Policy Research at OpenAI from 2018 to 24. Which is all the more reason to ask skeptical questions about claims like this.
What economists agree with this claim? (Where are citations/sources to back this claim?)
How will it come about politically? (Some countries are so polarised, they seem they'd prefer a civil war to anything as left-wing as UBI).
What would inflation be like if everyone had $10K UBI? (Would eggs be $1,000 a dozen?)
All the same, I'm glad he's at least brave enough to seriously face what most won't. It's just such a shame, as economists won't face this, we're left to deal with source-light discussion that doesn't rise much above anecdotes and opinions.
Former OpenAI researcher says a $10,000 monthly UBI will be 'feasible' with AI-enabled growth
its eligibility criteria to those with Italian parents or grandparents.
That's the existing criteria for Irish passports. I'd guess the number of Americans with one grandparent born in Ireland or Italy must run to 10s of millions.
In terms of advancing software, its extremely inefficient,
It amazes me how their BS on 'innovation' has infected broader culture and politics.
Look how little fundamental innovation there is in health, education and housing. All getting more expensive and out of reach.
Their hope seems to be to invent something proprietary and hypey that gets them bought up, not to actually build something functional.
They all seem to be chasing the dream of being unicorns (for the unintiated reading this, monopolist giants like Google/Meta, not magical horses).
Do American VCs even bother with start-ups who want to be small/medium sized firms, and have a solid case for making a few hundred million dollars every year?
Yes I did, and corrected it.
Oddly, 2024 new industrial robot numbers dropped for each of the EU, Japan and the US, too from the year before. Robot manufacturing means cheaper goods, and the EU, Japan & the US are already feeling the crunch. They don't seem to have any answer to the flood of good quality cheap electric vehicles that have made China the world's biggest car maker. These pressures are only going to get worse and worse.
2024 New Industrial Robots
290,000 - China
86,000 - EU
43,000 - Japan
34,000 - US
Chinese factories keep up robot roll-out despite global decline
I'm glad this helps people with paralysis, but I can't help seeing the sci-fi dystopian side of tech like this.
What if some people are forced to have their inner thoughts decoded against their will? It sounds like just the thing some authoritarian thought police would use to root out their enemies.
Does that sound far-fetched? I'm sure if it were suggested as an upgrade to existing lie-detecting polygraph tests, lots of people would approve. Slippery slope.
If you think of it as a pet alternative, its not so expensive. Food & vets bills for cats & dogs can easily be $1000 per year.
Here's a few; there's many more.
AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions
Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Training
Compromising Honesty and Harmlessness in Language Models via Deception Attacks
The Traitors: Deception and Trust in Multi‑Agent Language Model Simulations
Detecting Malicious AI Agents Through Simulated Interactions
Caveat - China Daily is owned and operated by the Chinese government/CCP. But the article is interesting in itself, and its official endorsement is interesting, too.