MisterFrog

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do we have a source? All I can tell it is from Australia before the Libs (the conservatives, for international readers) changed the name of Newstart to "Job Seeker".

They also renamed the Department of Human Services to Services Australia.

Every time they're in power, they're trying to remove all the welfare we've built up. They just can't because we love it.

If it weren't for Centrelink, I probably wouldn't have finished university, and I probably wouldn't be an engineer now.

Fuck austerity. And long may the LNP (the conservative coalition) be in complete shambles, ans hopefully push the Labor party back to its more left wing roots.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is the real answer. Really, really gross, just not necessarily illegal.

Age of consent varies. Example in Victoria Australia is it's within 2 years until 16, anyone from 16 as long as they're not your teacher or someone else with authority, and then 18 anyone older than 16.

Prevents stupid shit like I've heard from the US where an 18 year old gets booked because the parents don't like that their 17 year old is having sex...

Don't look up the age of consent in China, they've really dropped the ball on that one 👀

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Calling critics of a state and a polity racists is some high level bullshit

Did you criticise the Nazis? Pretty sure that means you hate all modern day Germans /s

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

*Gasp in Anime* That's impossible!!

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Am I a weirdo to thinks about turning my head to the left, not the back of my head to the right?

This doesn't seem intuitive

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I point out, not even China does this (in the vast majority of cases, I'm not gonna claim it's never happened)

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

People who go on holiday to the USA have something wrong in their brains.

The landscapes, food and historical locations would be cool to see, but man, it's bloody dystopian.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

A tale as old as time. Perhaps we ought to limit maximum wealth 👀

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Anyone who doesn't reflexively proclaim DATENSCHUTZ!!! at this, isn't a true German.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

This is what the minute and second hands are for, though

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have the same opinion of Israeli Jews as I have of Japanese people: you don't judge the individual who may have various views, you judge the voting block as a whole.

Same way I hold Japan responsible for pretending they didn't do war crimes, I also hold the Israeli people collectively responsible for the actions for their government.

They keep voting for it

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Wtf, I knew this guy was a nutter, but never really knew that much about him.

The USA is so screwed holy balls.

 

https://lemmy.world/comment/18176899

 

Engineering references that specify formulas with variables with specified units, instead of constants with defined units, are a travesty.

I refer to Crane Technical Paper 410 in this instance.

Why would I want

ΔP = 32000 μ L v/d^2 (for laminar flow)

You'd expect this to be a normal formula, which you do your own dimensional analysis, but no. Units are specified. But not even on the same page, no no, on a "nomenclature" page you have to know to look for.

ΔP in Pa

μ in cP

L in m

v in m/s

d in mm

When I could have

ΔP=32 μ L v/D²

and YOU use whatever units you want.

Hell I could even put imperial units in here if I were a masochist. Very upsetting.

Engineering textbooks/technical papers need to find Pure Math Jesus.

Formulas with hidden units? Not even once.

Crane TP 410. How could you?

 

Apparently 30 roses is $200 AUD ($126 USD).

Florists making a killing today.

38
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

I really want a Facebook (the old Facebook timeline) replacement, but end-to-end encrypted, and decentralised so there's longevity.

Edit for clarity: I'm looking for a way to share things online, end-to-end encrypted to a wide-audience that knows you but doesn't necessarily know each other.

This is why messaging apps don't fulfil this requirement, and chat rooms (like Matrix) also don't fit.


I love Lemmy, I like the idea of Mastodon (twitter-like sites just aren't my thing. ActivityPub rocks. However, none of them are encrypted.

PixelFed is neato, but I don't plan sharing my personal photos with the whole of the internet, which seems to be the only choice with ActivityPub.

Signal and other encrypted messaging apps are great, but are for direct messaging. Where are the encrypted social media apps?

Matrix is cool and all, but it's aimed at groups. Like discord / MS teams replacement.

Someone told me about Futo Circles, which seems to tick all the boxes and built on top of Matrix, but it's currently abandoned.

Are there any other alternatives? My wallet is open, I would very much like to use such an app. I am no programmer, so sadly cannot take on the mantle of continuing the Futo Circles project.

13
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/signal@lemmy.ml
 

I'm aware of how to set up chat backups on Android, but this only makes local backups that you have to manually upload or copy.

I'm trying to find a solution where I can set and forget backups to the cloud.

My requirements are:

  1. It doesn't require me exposing the rest of my file system/cloud storage to a third party app without scoping (filesync works, but doesn't meet this criteria).
  2. It can upload directly to a cloud service

So far, no dice :/

Is there some workaround?

P.S. my potential solution is move Signal to my Shelter Work profile, where I do have filesync installed, but then I won't have contacts access, which is a slight pain (and because I don't want to create contacts in my work profile).

 

@gofsckyourself@lemmy.world

 

Most recent example: I was asked to participate/lead our team's Movember campaign at my company.

How I politely declined: oh sorry, I'm a bit too busy with my personal life and work projects this year.

My unpopular opinion I couldn't say: it doesn't align with my values.

Movember raises money and promotes awareness of Men's health. Nothing wrong with the organisation themselves, but frankly I think the paltry couple of thousand of dollars our (pretty large) company manages to raise each year is a waste of time.

If we taxed corporations a fraction of a percent more on corporate profits we would bring is orders of magnitude more money than individuals asking others, out of the kindness of the hearts, for money.

Health research shouldn't have to beg for money, the government should just fund it with tax dollars. Taxes that you don't get to choose to pay. Other than by voting.

I hate fun runs, and do subtly judge those who participate in them, especially because (I think) they skew towards wealthier people, and it's their way of making themselves feel good for raising money for cancer or whatever, and then turn around and vote for tax cuts, and use accountants to make their tax liability as low as possible - something poorer people can't afford.

I used to give money to charity when I was younger. But I honestly think it's silly now, and it ought not have to exist.

(Mods, this is politics adjacent, but I feel is general enough to be compliant, since I'd say most people view charity organisations mostly favourably)

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21049862

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

 

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

view more: next ›