MisterFrog

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

This take makes a lot of sense, fair enough.

I guess I'm just expecting the worse because of all the norms they're breaking. Maybe not a war, but I would not be surprised if the CIA leans on us a little more heavily than they already have (allegedly, but let's be honest, very likely).

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm still (probably naively) hoping people wake the fuck up and resist like their lives depended up it.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This voting system does not spark joy (thanks for the explanation!)

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I feel like your (the US') only hope is a proper grassroots campaign.

Preferential voting or bust.

Because it's really going to be bust, at this rate.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I feel like what the rest of the world doesn't understand (I am from the "rest of the world), is that the USA is VASTLY more powerful than the Nazis ever were. Barely any country is sounding the alarm seriously. Just "oh we're concerned about what's happening".

We are truly fucked.

And we're under the US' thumb (Australia).

At least we're majority white...... maybe that'll keep us safe, temporarily.

I hate this timeline, so very much.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Do they not have preferential voting in the primaries?

Is this a specific NYC democratic party thing?

I am not from the US.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

As much as we'd all faun over the fall of the US empire, I don't think fascism in the US would work out well for anyone.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am aware of the historical origin. I did not previously in all honesty, so at least thanks for making me aware, I do rather enjoy etymology. However, this word no longer has these connotations which you're taking offence over.

I'm sorry that the origin of this word is painful for you, but no one is intending harm toward you or intending to degrade your sexuality by using this word.

People use it to describe someone who's being negligently self-centred and unempathetic. People simply don't associate it with sexuality, at all.

I understand because of your personal circumstances, and no doubt real discrimination you've faced, this word is a sore point for you.

However, if it's any consolation, for this one word in particular, you do not have to be sore, the meaning of the word has changed since it's origin.

You can either accept that or not.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

It is negative, but it's not insulting based on someone's sexuality! (Edit: I'm assuming you're referring to narcissist, not enthusiast)

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Because you're the first person I've ever encountered, and I'm willing to bet the last, who's offended by this word.

If things change, as language does, and your position gains any traction, and the word really does start to mean what you alone think it currently means, then I will happily stop. Currently the implications you're asserting exist with its use, simply don't for the vast majority of its users.

This isn't anything like pronouns, or names, which are personal, I'm happy to call people anything that makes them happy.

This is a meaning of a word, and language is constantly evolving. It's used to communicate, and I'm not going to stop using a word because one rando on the internet has decided it means something no one else thinks it means.

For real, stop being offended by something simply because of historical meanings.

Next minute you're going to be mad about me using the word "enthusiast" because it had negative connotations in the 1600s, or whatever other random example you can think of.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

🫡 Edit: such a missed opportunity, since you can both say it back to each other

 

Engineering references that specify formulas with variables with specified units, instead of constants with defined units, are a travesty.

I refer to Crane Technical Paper 410 in this instance.

Why would I want

ΔP = 32000 μ L v/d^2 (for laminar flow)

You'd expect this to be a normal formula, which you do your own dimensional analysis, but no. Units are specified. But not even on the same page, no no, on a "nomenclature" page you have to know to look for.

ΔP in Pa

μ in cP

L in m

v in m/s

d in mm

When I could have

ΔP=32 μ L v/D²

and YOU use whatever units you want.

Hell I could even put imperial units in here if I were a masochist. Very upsetting.

Engineering textbooks/technical papers need to find Pure Math Jesus.

Formulas with hidden units? Not even once.

Crane TP 410. How could you?

 

Apparently 30 roses is $200 AUD ($126 USD).

Florists making a killing today.

38
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

I really want a Facebook (the old Facebook timeline) replacement, but end-to-end encrypted, and decentralised so there's longevity.

Edit for clarity: I'm looking for a way to share things online, end-to-end encrypted to a wide-audience that knows you but doesn't necessarily know each other.

This is why messaging apps don't fulfil this requirement, and chat rooms (like Matrix) also don't fit.


I love Lemmy, I like the idea of Mastodon (twitter-like sites just aren't my thing. ActivityPub rocks. However, none of them are encrypted.

PixelFed is neato, but I don't plan sharing my personal photos with the whole of the internet, which seems to be the only choice with ActivityPub.

Signal and other encrypted messaging apps are great, but are for direct messaging. Where are the encrypted social media apps?

Matrix is cool and all, but it's aimed at groups. Like discord / MS teams replacement.

Someone told me about Futo Circles, which seems to tick all the boxes and built on top of Matrix, but it's currently abandoned.

Are there any other alternatives? My wallet is open, I would very much like to use such an app. I am no programmer, so sadly cannot take on the mantle of continuing the Futo Circles project.

13
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/signal@lemmy.ml
 

I'm aware of how to set up chat backups on Android, but this only makes local backups that you have to manually upload or copy.

I'm trying to find a solution where I can set and forget backups to the cloud.

My requirements are:

  1. It doesn't require me exposing the rest of my file system/cloud storage to a third party app without scoping (filesync works, but doesn't meet this criteria).
  2. It can upload directly to a cloud service

So far, no dice :/

Is there some workaround?

P.S. my potential solution is move Signal to my Shelter Work profile, where I do have filesync installed, but then I won't have contacts access, which is a slight pain (and because I don't want to create contacts in my work profile).

 

@gofsckyourself@lemmy.world

 

Most recent example: I was asked to participate/lead our team's Movember campaign at my company.

How I politely declined: oh sorry, I'm a bit too busy with my personal life and work projects this year.

My unpopular opinion I couldn't say: it doesn't align with my values.

Movember raises money and promotes awareness of Men's health. Nothing wrong with the organisation themselves, but frankly I think the paltry couple of thousand of dollars our (pretty large) company manages to raise each year is a waste of time.

If we taxed corporations a fraction of a percent more on corporate profits we would bring is orders of magnitude more money than individuals asking others, out of the kindness of the hearts, for money.

Health research shouldn't have to beg for money, the government should just fund it with tax dollars. Taxes that you don't get to choose to pay. Other than by voting.

I hate fun runs, and do subtly judge those who participate in them, especially because (I think) they skew towards wealthier people, and it's their way of making themselves feel good for raising money for cancer or whatever, and then turn around and vote for tax cuts, and use accountants to make their tax liability as low as possible - something poorer people can't afford.

I used to give money to charity when I was younger. But I honestly think it's silly now, and it ought not have to exist.

(Mods, this is politics adjacent, but I feel is general enough to be compliant, since I'd say most people view charity organisations mostly favourably)

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21049862

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

 

The only numbers I will ever spell are one and zero, and only when using them as a pronoun, or for emphasis, respectively.

Is there ever a reason to not to use symbols when dealing with numbers? Why would "fourteen whatevers" ever be preferable to "14 whatevers". It's just so much easier to read numbers as symbols, not spelled out.

(Caveat, not including multipliers, like "273 billion").

 

How many times do you think about the Roman Empire per day?

view more: next ›