if you're going via prescriptivism, then you're wrong, because there are plenty of authoritative sources following the left hand model
if you're going via descriptivism, then you're wrong, because this thread exists
Primarily0617
but which axioms you decide are in use is an arbitrary choice
And in the "actual" order of operations, if we want to pretend one exists, 2(
binds more tightly than ÷
if you're going via prescriptivism, then you're wrong, because there are plenty of authoritative sources following the left hand model
if you're going via descriptivism, then you're wrong, because this thread exists
math is literally the only subject that has rules set in stone
go past past high school and this isn't remotely true
there are areas of study where 1+1=1
You're taking something you learned when you were like 9 years old and assuming it's correct in every situation forever.
Unfortunately this isn't the case and you're incorrect.
oh my sweet baby did you only just learn that not everything on the internet is meant for realsies?
when i say i don't think you understand irony, i don't mean here specifically
also, even if it weren't, they're a HEATHEN
it's practically in the job description to make you uncomfortable
the meme format is
you are X because [normal, justifiable reason]
i am X because [degenerate reason that only a little freak could provide]
we are not the same
i don't think you understand irony
you're essentially asking somebody to talk about their hobby, so it makes sense
what the fuck is going on in the comments of that video? The "$AMA59X" bots are doing some of the shoddiest astroturfing I've seen in years
you know you could've just started this by admitting you've never touched the subject at a higher level than high school and saved us all this bother