I think you mean:

yes (the environmental angle is a complete distraction and red herring from moving towards more sustainable energy production generally; the ethical one is just plain nonsense spread by people with absolutely no idea how these things work)

yes (people use and like them, people have fun with them and create great art with them. You might not but that’s a you problem)

and … well actually probably no tbh (but that’s a problem with capitalism not technology).

Stop making shit up to dismiss new technology because you’re a luddite

Maybe learn what you're talking about and stop panicking. Attack the right things not the this new technology

You're being disingenuous by trying to redefine the concept of theft. It does not steal anything by any definition of the word. It learn using a neural network similar to, but much simpler than, the one in your head

That is at least borderline more correct, but it's still wrong. It learns using a neural network much like, but much simpler than, the one in your head

Do you go into a gallery and scream "THIS ART WAS INSPIRED BY PICASSO. WHY DOESN'T IT SAY THAT! tHIS IS THEFT!" - no, I suspect you don't because that would be stupid. That's what you sound like here

Amusingly, every argument against ai art was made against photography over a hundred years ago, and I bet you own a camera - possibly even on the device you wrote your stupid comment on!

Nope. Stop with the luddite lies please