ValueSubtracted

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

The 2026 Star Trek Ships of the Line Calendar, featuring the Original Starship Enterprise on the cover, over a planet with a shuttlecraft in the foreground and a one nacelled starship to the right behind it.

The back page of the Star Trek Ships of the Line Calendar for 2026 with multiple inset images of all the hero ships from Star Trek shows done by a variety of artists in photo real to cartoon styles, all in original artwork just for the calendar.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's worth noting that in the months preceding the 1995 referendum, the "yes" movement was hovering around 37%. They managed to propel that to 49.42% result in the referendum itself.

Definitely not to be taken lightly.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

That poll is cited in the piece, and the fact that separatist sentiments in AB and SK are roughly on par with QC (where it's still treated as a serious threat) is kind of the central point.

We are all Robyn Gossage from "Lux", and she is us.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I'm willing to withhold judgment - the TARDIS violently "bouncing off" of that date is fun - but it is a bit of a head-scratcher. Right up there with the Weeping Angels Paradox that claimed Amy and Rory.

You wanted them to kill Belinda with a frock? You monster.

The lesser of the two evils in the race, so that's...good?

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t get the “sequel to “Midnight”” thing, though.

I haven't finished it yet, but the YT video I just shared to the community is shedding some light on how it came about.

TL;DW, they were having trouble getting their original idea (involving actual Nigerian gods) to work, scrapped it, noticed the similarities between what they had left and "Midnight", and leaned into it.

I don't really have a big issue with the entity's shifting motivation - and they did handwave it a bit by saying it was "leaning" during that first episode - but I think it's incredibly risky to do a sequel to an episode that's basically perfect.

Nowhere to go but down, even if you name something that's very good.

I wonder if she might recognize some scents from her holodeck...adventures with Shaxs.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In today's society, probably not - in "Unleashed", Rose Ayling-Ellis says it takes the average person about seven years to become fluent. But it's a good dream to have, and if people started learning early enough in life, and valued it enough...

As for the Lombardians, maybe they have some improved sci-fi educational techniques. But at the same time, they clearly don't have the same expectations of their soldiers...

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Flood Watch 2025

So, Mrs. Flood may not be human, but rather Lombardic, a conveniently human-like species that apparently rose to prominence after Earth was destroyed on May 24, 2025.

And it's possible that she's not so much interested in the Doctor, but rather the Vindicator, which is capable of triangulating and locking on to a particular date, and "reeling it in" in order to travel to it.

Okay, I was aware of the rumours that this was going to be a sequel to "Midnight", and sure enough...

Unfortunately, I'm not sure it was worth it. "Midnight" is so perfect as self-contained story about an inexplicable, unexplainable evil, and this episode didn't really bring much new to the table.

That said, it was engaging, and I enjoyed watching it. I guess my biggest complaint is that when you lose the abject terror of "Midnight", it's easier to get distracted trying to figure out the "rules" of the entity, and how it works. The performances were all excellent, and it's always good to have a horror story of this nature, but I don't think it's going to end up on my list of all-time great episodes.

I thought the reuse of Britney Spears' "Toxic" was a little puzzling - I guess the connection is that it was the last song heard in the history of Earth in "The End of the World", which gives it some weight now that the Earth is gone?

I reject the framing of DEI as a "right buzzword." Don't let them co-opt it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›