[-] Vexz@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

It's just Mullvad and you have to pay 10€. If you buy Mullvad's VPN service directly from their website you only pay 5€ and you get much more with the client they offer. So if you ask me the better choice is obvious.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Look at this thread to find some inspiration of what you can do to increase your online privacy.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

While it was obvious they'd do this at least they say it out loud now.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought of a similar thread but I think the results would be pretty much the same. It's great to have some mutual inspiration here.

Anyway, there's tons of stuff I can list here. I'm gonna list some stuff but will probably forget 70% of the other stuff because it's become so common in my daily life.

  • Own NAS as private cloud
  • Self-host on my NAS to not use internet services that spy on me (like Bitwarden, Joplin server, cryptgeon, Syncthing, Nextcloud)
  • OPNsense as my router of choice
  • W10Privacy (because I still can't switch to Linux because of circumstances)
  • Firefox as my browser of choice with some extra settings to harden it (I tried something like LibreWolf in the past but I can't use Spotify without DRM)
  • uBlock Origin of course (and some other browser addons like LibRedirect, ClearURLs, Decentraleyes and so on)
  • Privacy respecting mail provider (mailbox.org)
  • Signal (instead of WhatsApp)
  • Thunderbird (instead of something like Outlook)
  • Piped (instead of YouTube)
  • Uninstalled/disabled all apps on my phone that I don't need (also saves battery)
  • Been using custom ROMs on my phone (but I made some bad experiences with stability so I stick with the stock ROM for now)
  • NextDNS (with encrypted DNS)
  • Whoogle (instead of Google)
  • Lemmy (instead of reddit, haha)
  • Avoid accounts (and even links) to something like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and so on
  • Libreddit, Nitter and all the other privacy friendly frontends for social media
  • Never connected devices to my LAN/Wi-Fi that don't need an internet connection (like a stove lol) and never installed the apps on my phone to operate them

Gonna add some more to the list whenever something comes up in my mind. Like I said it's become so basic in my life that I don't always think about it anymore when I use it.

Btw things like 2FA only help with security, not privacy.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

You don't need to do it with every version. I only patch a new version every 6 months. That's more than enough.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for that hint. It might be possible to route all traffic of a docker container through a vpn connection. This way you could make SearXNG (or any other self hosted search engine in Docker) use a remote VPN server and make it prompt the searches. See here.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Of course I did. The thing is that the reliability of the search engines per instance varies from time to time so there's not a single instance that will always work perfectly and never has timeouts.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I think you can even port forward with the free plan of ProtonVPN.

17
submitted 1 year ago by Vexz@feddit.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

People always say it's the best in regards of privacy to self-host your own search engine. So I started doing that a while ago. But there's one thing I'm concerned about in regards of privacy when you self-host your own search engine.

Does it make any sense to self-host your search engine at home? See, I have a NAS with Docker. Inside Docker I ran instances of SearXNG and Whoogle. These search engines are just proxies for public search engines like Google. This means if I use my self-hosted search engine to search something, the search engine does the search and delivers the results to me. So for example SearXNG uses my public IP to search something on (for example) Google. That can't be better than using a public instance of SearXNG, Whoogle, LibreX and whatnot, right? So the best thing you can do is to rent a server in some cloud and host your private search engine there.

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Some thoughts from a long term SearXNG user: While I really appreciate how privacy respecting SearXNG is I had a lot of trouble with it. Often enough you get 0 results because of timeouts with the search engines it uses and sometimes the order of the presented search results isn't good. Sometimes the thing I've been searching for was the 10th result while in other search engines it was the first result. So the prioritizing of the results is often enough just odd.

We live in a time where there are so many search engines but all of them have their flaws. It's really frustrating. :(

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That's weird, I never had memory leak problems.

I don't like Whoogle because of their UI for image searches. Imo it's really bad but that's just my opinion. The image search is also the reason why I don't use Brave Search because it redirects you to Google or Bing. What's the point in being "a privacy respecting search engine" when you get redirected to Google and Bing which are the worst search engines in terms of privacy?

[-] Vexz@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Been using a self hosted instance of SearXNG but recently went away from SearXNG in gerneral. Why? Search results more than often enough ended in timeouts from the search engines. It was frustrating and they never fixed it. In terms of privacy it's top notch though.

0
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Vexz@feddit.de to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

I'm currently using a self hosted instance of XWiki on my NAS to write down long term notes just for myself. But it runs very slow with the database and limited hardware ressources. And since I only access it from my Windows PC on my LAN I figured I'd just need an application that does the same job and save the files on my NAS.

So does anyboy know a good Open Source application for Windows that can be used like that? It needs features like these:

  • WYSIWYG editor
  • tables
  • font colors
  • font highlights
  • text code
  • headings
  • embed images
  • embed YouTube links
  • (un-)ordered lists
  • bold text
  • underlined text

Thanks in advance!

Edit: Added WYSIWYG editor to the list.

view more: next ›

Vexz

joined 1 year ago