Don't try frozen or dehydrated. Try fresh.
ZDL
Durian is incredible! Second or third best fruit in my view!
Send me yours.
I mean if it's the real stuff, not the black plastic stuff sold as "Twizzlers" or the like.
I have friends that openly admit they’d rather use AI to generate “art” and then call people who are upset by this luddites, whiny and butt-hurt that AI “does it better”
Anybody who thinks AI does art "better" is someone whose opinions in all matters, big or small, can be safely dismissed.
I struggle to understand why everyone is going along with it.
- It seems cheaper. (corporate world)
- There's a certain amount of jealousy that the "untalented" (by their own estimation) have against the "talented" (again by their own estimation). (non-corporate world)
Basically hiring someone to do creative stuff is "too expensive" and it seems cheaper to just push slop out. (When, not if, it fails, of course the decision to use slop is not ever accepted as the reason for the failure...)
And for the second group, it turns out being "creative" is REALLY GOD-DAMNED HARD WORK. They don't want to put in work to create art. They want to type in a few words and get something that kinda/sorta does what they want.
They’ll literally paste my assignment into ChatGPT and paste ChatGPT’s response back to me.
I solved a similar problem when teaching EFL (students just pasting assignments written in Chinese into a translator) by making them read select paragraphs out loud to me. You can rapidly spot the people who have no idea what the words they're reading mean (or in my case are even pronounced on top of that!) and ...
Well, cheating gets you 0.
These tools can easily be injected with biases like [Grok's unprompted white supremacist ramblings] (and much more subtly too) to turn them into a giant propaganda machine.
It's fortunate that Kaptain Ketamine had his little binge of his favourite drug and made it SO OBVIOUS. There's subtle biases all over degenerative AI. Like there was a phase when trying out the "art" creators where I couldn't get any of them to portray someone writing with their left hand. (I don't know if they still have a problem with that; I got bored with AI "art" once I saw its limitations.) And if the word "thug" was in the prompt it was about 80% chance of being a black guy. Or if the word "professional" was in the prompt it was about 80% chance of being a white guy. EXCEPT if "marketing" was added (as in "marketing professional"). Then for some reason it was almost always an Asian woman.
Or we can look at Perplexity, supposedly driven by not only its model, but incorporation of search results into the prompt. Ask it a question about any big techbrodude AI and its first responses will be positive and singing the praises of the AI renaissance. If you push (not even very hard) you can start getting it to confess to the flaws of LLMs, diffusion models, etc. and to the flaws of the corporate manoeuvring around pushing AI into everything, but the FIRST response (and the one people most likely stop reading after) is always pushing the glory of the AI revolution.
(Kind of like Chinese propaganda, really. You can get Party officials to admit to errors of judgment and outright vile acts of the past in conversation, but their first answer is always the glory of the Party!)
Oh, and then let's look at what's on the Internet where most of the data gets sucked up from. There's probably about three orders of magnitude more text about Sonic the Hedgehog in your average LLM's model than there is about, oh, I don't know, off the top of my head, Daoism, literally the most influential philosophical school of the world's most populous country! Hell, there's probably more information about Mario and Luigi from Nintendo than there is about the Bible, arguably the most widespread and influential book around the world!
I wonder how that skews the bias...?
When most people talk about "hating AI" they're talking the AI that is this wave before the next winter: (de)generative AI (whether based on LLM or diffusion or whatever ever other tripe drives things like GPT, DALL-E, Jukebox, etc.).
And yes, I hate AI in that sense, in that it is a dead end that is currently burning up the planet to produce subpar everything (words, images, music) while threatening the very foundation of cultural knowledge with obliteration.
AI in a broader sense, I don't hate. Even the earlier over-hyped-before-wintered AI technologies have found niche applications where they're useful, and once the grifters leave the (de)generative AI field we may find some use cases for AI there as well. (I think LLMs have a future, for example, in the field of translation: I've been experimenting with that domain and once the techbrodude know-it-all personality is excised from the LLMs and the phrase "I don't know" is actually incorporated properly I think it could be very valuable there. You still have to look out for hallucinations, though.)
But (de)generative AI in general is overhyped shit. And it's overhyped shit that cannot be meaningfully improved (indeed latter-day models turn out to be worse than earlier ones: ChatGPT4's suite is more prone to hallucination, for example, than ChatGPT3.5). So a whole lot of people are getting pressured, a whole lot of lives are being ruined, a whole lot of misinformation and active disinformation is being spewed by them ... but hey, at least we can have shit writing, shit art, and shit music!
I know A.I might be used for replacing jobs, but that has happened many times before, and it is mostly a positive move forward like with the internet.
This is an excuse used many times but it doesn't stand to inspection. Let's go with robots making cars. When the auto industry had massive layoffs in the '80s the median age for factory workers assembling cars was about the early '30s. What proportion of people in their '30s make any kind of transition to stable, well-paid careers when they're rendered redundant? (Hint: not very many.) An entire generation of the rust belt, in effect, because of automation, were shoved into poverty THAT WE STILL SEE TO THIS DAY. And that's one sector. Automation shit-canned a whole lot of sectors and the reverberations of that have echoed throughout my entire life. (Born in the '60s.)
The only "positive move forward" seen by these traumatically devastating technologies released willy-nilly into society with no mitigation plan is that rich fuckers get richer. Because, you know, Sam Altman needs more cash and not a punch to his oh-so-punchable face.
The followup is worse.
They just published an insert from Hearst. The source of the fake list was HEARST.
Legacy media is officially dead.
We could stand a lot more tragedy of the latter kind. The "OR WORSE!" variety, in fact.
Cinnamon is the bomb in non-sweet foods too. A Chongqing hot pot has dried chili peppers (OH SO MANY!), Sichuan peppercorns (red and green), star anise, cassia cinnamon (as opposed to Ceylon cinnamon), bay leaves, Chinese black cardamom, Doubanjiang (a peppery bean paste), fermented black beans, garlic, ginger, scallions, onion, and coriander (cilantro).
If I haven't made people cringe with at least one of those ingredients, I've found someone with a very broad palate! 🤣
I've come to a rather bleak conclusion: Most people can't distinguish between shit art and good art.
I mean I've kind of suspected this all along given what music is popular vs. what music is good, but when I hear what Udio users call their "bangers" I had it confirmed.
Most people have a tin ear. I suspect the same applies to visual and written arts: not just no taste, not even able to understand what taste, as a sense, even is.