bitofhope

Perfect timing, "self", if that really is your name. I was just getting tired of the dirty talk 😇

Me dropping a radioactive gold bar on my foot: "Au!"

Oh dear, please give Mr. Gerard my apologies for assuming first name basis, how impolite of me.

I think calling gold "most stable currency in human history" is pretty buggish, but maybe by the time I'm intellectually ready to go back to college I'll figure out why it isn't.

Sure, investment in gold is reasonable. Particularly compared to most of whatever the hell Trump administration is doing. You said goldbugs are unreasonable yourself, so your initial hostile tone seems misplaced. Most likely you either misunderstood what was said or felt that the remark about goldbugs was meant to include people as reasonable as yourself, even though no one said investing in gold is unreasonable per se.

As for your later hostile tone, that is perfectly understandable because I'm being almost as much of a condescending dick as you are.

Come to think of it, dragon types are know to be big on hoarding gold so I guess it's natural for you to take the issue so personally.

Hey, there's a new government program to provide care for dementia patients. I should found a company to make myself a middleman for all those sweet Medicare bucks. All I need is a nice, friendly but smart sounding name. Oh, that's it! I'll call it Frenology!

Okay ~~dadd~~professor. Most of us were agreeing that Trump admin trading gold reserves for cryptocoins is a stupid idea. This seems to have attracted people who agreed for the incorrect reason, namely that they think inert yellow metal is the fundamental source and measure of wealth, which David called out. After that it could be one of three things:

a) You misunderstood what David wrote and rudely insinuated he is unfamiliar with the concept of speculative investment.

b) You correctly understood what David wrote and — being a goldbug yourself — took issue with it and proceeded to make the aforementioned rude insinuation.

c) You're flirting with me a bit too aggressively and it's activating my brat instincts, professor~

I wrote down some theorems and looked at them through a microscope and actually discovered the objectively correct solution to ethics. I won't tell you what it is because science should be kept secret (and I could prove it but shouldn't and won't).

The headline is a bit of a crash blossom, but if you read the article, the comments in this thread, or even the title itself carefully enough, you should be able to parse it. If not, I'll help:

A startup company named "11x", whose business model is AI sales, claims to have customers for its software (which incidentally doesn't work), who in fact are not their customers.

This is not funny. My best friend died of whatever. If y'all didn't hate saltman so much maybe he'd still be here with us.

Beanie Babies are real and generally increase in value.

You probably felt really smart when wrtiting that comment, and that's totally normal and valid. Everyone has lapses in reading comprehension sometimes.

I know the GNU Infant Manipulation Program can be a little unintuitive and clunky sometimes, but it is quite powerful when you get used to it. Also why does everyone always look at me weird when I say that?

Surely not, their whole dev team is made of 11x programmers!