Remember, their recent statement that they don't need any ethics oversight was unanimous.
buckykat
joined 2 years ago
Which is, itself, a disaster.
You think this SCOTUS will be consistent in its rulings?
It's safer for bikes to ignore those, that's why some states that are smarter about it have legalized the Idaho stop
Trump is what the Republican party has been working on creating at least since Nixon
Parental Rights is pretty much always right wing crazies trying to keep their kids ignorant and controlled
The priesthood of capitalism
From the Wikipedia page for Paul Erdős:
After his mother's death in 1971 he started taking antidepressants and amphetamines, despite the concern of his friends, one of whom (Ron Graham) bet him $500 that he could not stop taking them for a month. Erdős won the bet, but complained that it impacted his performance: "You've showed me I'm not an addict. But I didn't get any work done. I'd get up in the morning and stare at a blank piece of paper. I'd have no ideas, just like an ordinary person. You've set mathematics back a month."[66] After he won the bet, he promptly resumed his use of Ritalin and Benzedrine.[67]
All theft from companies but especially theft of things I personally disapprove of.
Piracy is free though
Ignoring stupid car-centric traffic laws on a bicycle is safe and reasonable.