32
submitted 1 week ago by chrizzowski@lemmy.ca to c/analog@lemmy.world

I think it was on a 50mm? Dev FlicFilm Black White & Green, 13 min w/3 agitations per min. Scanned XT4 and XF80mm macro.

23
submitted 2 weeks ago by chrizzowski@lemmy.ca to c/analog@lemmy.world

Most recent of my few outings with the Intrepid! Coming to terms with 4x5 I think.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Old camera lenses are awesome. I've got some steel and glass rokkors that are beautiful. They render in such a wonderful way too, so painterly. They have thorium in the glass! Not enough to be sketchy to use but something that obviously isn't done anymore. Bonus points that they can be fixed with a hammer.

Old camera stuff in general is subjectively cooler. The leaf shutters in my 4x5 lenses are incredible little machines. Film in general is cooler than whatever sensor the latest and greatest has. Actual bits of silver suspended in emulsion, with colour filters and dye couplers that react in development. There's a great three part video on YouTube breaking down Kodak's manufacturing process. It's mind boggling that stuff even works. Ohhhh and actually darkroom optical prints! Don't get me started there!

I'm going to develop some rolls I think. Got me in the mood.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

Knocking on the door of 40. I spent this week moving into my own new place after a decade of toxicity, so this one resonates with me as well.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago

And still is. I shoot a fair bit of black and white film. It's cheaper, I can develop it at home, it produces a silver negative that will last centuries. The medium itself had been around for a century, so it imparts a sense of timelessness. I appreciate a good photo that you can't tell if it's 1924 or 2024 until you notice some dude with a cellphone in the background.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

I'm an architect. It's nice having the project I'm actively working on always active on one screen, with design sketches, marked up revisions, email with comments from client, renderer etc. active on the other. Sure it only saves a second not having to tab back and forth, but if you're doing it non stop all day it makes a big difference. Also just less effort.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

"gluteal crease" that's a new one for me, well done.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

I think this is a huge part of the problem. Rental property owners are just a liability buffer for the banks. There should be mortgages at a 1% down payment for first time buyers with a proven track record of making rent payments on time. Maybe the rates are a little higher, with the extra interest giving the banks motivation for taking on the extra risk. Then after the first term the owner can renew with a normal rate.

Doesn't help with the demand issue, but maybe all the rentals will flood the market after nobody is being punished for not having $100k laying around because they're busy paying someone else's carrying costs.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 25 points 11 months ago

It's not a distraction so much as it's the bait. Gas cooking gets the utility serviced to the building, which enables the gas furnace vs electric heat pump conversation. Gas furnace is cheaper up front, so that's what goes into suburbia.

Builders and developers will always do the absolutely cheapest thing possible to stay competitive, and will only do better when they're either legislated to or consumers demand it. Home builders associations lobby to keep minimum requirements ... minimal, and most consumers just see pretty showers and big kitchen islands, so this is why we still build houses like it's 1980.

Always amuses me how many people care about gas mileage on a $50k car but couldn't give two shits if their $2m home is efficient.

Source: I'm a home designer who frequently has this conversation and that's usually how it goes down.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Photography, mostly landscapes. Something satisfying about capturing the essence of a beautiful view and being able to share it with others who couldn't be there to savour the moment. Sometimes a fancy digital camera, sometimes old timey film cameras my grandpa got me into. I'm also into backpacking, climbing, splitboarding, and otherwise just spending time in the mountains so there's no shortage of views to capture.

5

Trying to make up my mind whether to continue home developing and scanning, or go back to using a lab. Thought I'd use this as a sounding board for my thoughts and for the sake of discussion.

So I've home developed for maybe five years now with mixed results. Mostly black and white, tried c41 but the chemical disposal is tricky where I am, and I don't shoot enough of it to keep fresh chemicals. I quite enjoy the development process actually, mad scientist in his bathroom laboratory and all that.

The scanning gets me though. Went from cheap flatbed to scanning with my Fuji XT4 and that helped. Getting a smoking deal on Fuji's native 80mm macro helped a lot more, but despite my efforts there's still a struggle with flat negatives, dust, water spots, and the digital workflow of cropping, inverting, colour balancing, dust cloning is sorta tedious. I shoot film partly to get away from screens but the edits take me way longer than my digital workflow. Often leaves me wondering if this is worth it? I started home developing so I could shoot more film, but for the amount of time and tedium it takes me, with mixed results, I've found myself shooting even less.

On the other side, I have a great lab semi local to me. They're a pro lab that works with you and caters specifically to your style with the scans so minimal edits. They scan on a Fuji Frontier at some pretty ridiculous resolutions and it always comes back way more sharp yet natural than my home efforts. The downside is pretty obvious though, they charge $30CAD per roll. Add the cost of film, shipping to send in a few at a time, it works out to about $1.50 per frame, which leaves me asking if this is worth it!

It's not entirely about the money though, as expensive as it is I could just sit down and do my job for the same time it takes me to develop and edit a roll and probably come out ahead.

Could argue just doing both, but I feel like I'd have a banger of a shoot that I didn't do justice with my own workflow, then get a bunch of impeccably processed and scanned lab images of an uninspired boring roll. Plus even more expired chemicals from doing less rolls in house.

Not a question of abandoning film entirely. Too much enjoyment from the using the gear, too much sentimental value using gear from friends and family who've passed.

I'm leaning towards going back to the lab, for a while at least, and see how I get on. Yeah it'll run $500-$1000 a year, but it's cheaper than drugs at least so there's that. Plus I could flip the Fuji macro and cover a year's worth of lab fees right there.

So that's my bit of a ramble, mostly just thinking out loud. Anyone ever go through a similar dilemma? Regret ditching the home kit and losing control of the entire process? Regret hours spent sloshing tanks around instead of out shooting?

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Don't let this discourage anyone from trying. Yes it sounds absurd when put that way, and yes the costs are getting out of hand at most major resorts, but it can be an absolutely amazing sport/hobby/passion/lifestyle.

The first few times add up cost wise, hard to get around that, but once you figure out what you're doing and make the decision the sport is for you then it gets better. With a season pass and my own gear I'm <$30cad a day on the hill, and that's at a major BC resort.

Still a big wad of cash for gear and a pass up front, and definitely coming from a privileged lens to say that it's affordable, but lots of people spend way more than that on take out, coffee, booze, streaming services, etc. All about priorities!

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

So a water source heat pump tapping into mine shafts, neat. Run the heat pump off wind or solar, have a decent thermal envelope to lower overall demand, voila emission free heating and cooling. Sounds promising to me.

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

Film photography. With smartphones having taken over the roll of point and shoots and covering the majority of people's photography needs, it's quite a different experience breaking out a half century old camera. Everything is more tactile, your shots are finite, and the result is a 100% determined by your decisions. Different films produce different results, and if you get into developing your own film you get to play mad chemist in the bathroom.

There's a learning curve, but if you're already into photography and understand the basics it's really not that hard. Labs still exist to develop for you if you'd rather not go down that rabbit hole. The results may surprise you!

[-] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Wildfires had my place on evacuation alert, the garbage dump was on fire with 800+ AQI index, so I said fuck this and got out of town for the weekend. Two hours later I got the Amazon delivery notification. World was burning and couldn't breathe, but Amazon finds a way.

3
submitted 1 year ago by chrizzowski@lemmy.ca to c/analog@lemmy.world

Shot from East Post Spire. One of my favourites!

2
submitted 1 year ago by chrizzowski@lemmy.ca to c/analog@lemmy.world

Photo walk back in winter. Old mill site that's being rehabilitated for future development. Make a point to wander by every now and then and document the progress.

view more: next ›

chrizzowski

joined 1 year ago