Because she's that popular.
I'm willing to bet there were a comfortable 7 figures worth of extra viewers just because she was at the game.
It means you'll use a third party app to watch content, just like you do for pretty much every type of content on iPhone and Android.
Just no one has published one for Apple vision yet, because no one has had one.
There's not a lot that kills my faith in a game like a studio having two active early access games with premises people are interested in, but that need work, and deciding that promoting a third new game is a better use of their time.
Oh, didn't notice you were the valve troll.
Carry on with your bullshit.
Fucking ludicrous.
You know what game you're capturing. You know the content rating. Just don't show captures from M rated games to people who have restricted access to M rated games. And give an easy opt out on any content from an M rated game to prevent more from showing.
Or, just don't fucking share stuff without an opt-in.
This is how you communicate a security breach.
Oh this is actual medicine.
I fully expected some fluff piece about using cancer metaphorically, but this is a pretty interesting piece about how the word cancer colors a patient's perception of risk and treatment approaches.
It depends.
You can basically always use the crappy ones made for general touchscreens to replicate your finger. You can't use a real one with features like Apple Pencil/surface pen/wacom without an extra layer built into the screen to recognize them.
A fucking DNS resolver. And just blocking it in Germany isn't enough because VPNs exist.
Holy fucking hell what an insane judicial overreach.
What benefit of the doubt?
The absolute best possible case is repulsive.
It doesn't matter what the tradeoffs are. The data does not and cannot belong to you.
There is no way of collecting telemetry while respecting privacy*. The pure fact that you're collecting anything the user didn't explicitly consent to is an unacceptable violation. Anonymization doesn't mean you aren't taking data that isn't yours.
*edit: without opt in. The acceptable way to do it is to make your ask, make the user make one choice or the other, and respect it.
conciselyverbose
joined 1 year ago
I really want absolutely no part of people who don't understand code using LLMs to submit things they don't understand. That's a disaster waiting to happen at best.
If you don't understand every line you're submitting completely, you should not be submitting code. It absolutely does need to be restricted to people who know what they're doing.