[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago

That is not a winning elevator pitch, that sounds like a dumpster fire of elements in an always online package.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

I think it's the fact that not everything needs a 20 minute video. There's a lot of topics that I'm interested in but skip because I don't have 20, 30, 40, 60 minutes for it.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

The people who made halo are scattered to the wind my dude. Most of them did jump to 343, and a lot of the ones who stayed were driven off during the destiny/Activision years.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

I think people like that view Linux as some kind of fiefdom rather than a community of individuals.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

Just another old dude complaining that his interests and the internet spaces that discuss them has become more accessible in the last thirty years. This type of greybeard elitism got in my way when I was trying to learn and if I hadn't been self motivated to keep learning, that might have been the end of it. The biggest takeaway from this discussion is that Google is regressing in usefulness and that discord was always a bad place to store information.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

My guy do you really not understand the shared desire of corporations to prevent solidarity and organization among workers?

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

From the point of web infrastructure and standards, they certainly do.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

People feel the same way about cars, electricity, food preservation. People's lives are interdependent on massively specialized technical disciplines and most of them couldn't care less. I understand that the amount of specialization that goes into some topics means you can't be an expert on all of these subjects, but some people just could not give a single shit how any of it works, and do not have any understanding of the ways in which it might stop working.

I've come to greatly resent any sort of technology or design being dismissed as "magic", because I've met too many people who mean it literally.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

If the second one is true, even in a subjective sense, I'm honestly just impressed. I mean, if it works, it works.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago

Demand is what causes Supply. Somewhere out there is someone with the skill to crack Denuvo, but no need to, because this lunatic is already doing it. And being the competition means being on empress' radar, which is really something a sane person would not want.

[-] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

What no proper version control does to a mfer.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

I know there were some oddities about this but I can't find the previous discussion I had seen on the matter. I am subscribed to a handful of communities from when I joined here on sh.itjust.works, but it's not consistent. Several communities appear fine in my feed despite my "subscription pending".

But for new communities, the "subscribe" button is not actually a button, regardless if they're here on sh.itjust.works or elsewhere. I could theoretically subscribe from the list of communities, but I'm interested in looking for communities on specific topics and I expect I could be scrolling for days before I find them. As soon as I use the search feature, I'm given a list without a column of "subscribe" links and I'm back to square one with needing to navigate directly to that community.

Am I the only one experiencing this? Is the source of this problem known? I've been advocating patience with the growing pains the threadiverse is likely to experience, but this is a really critical part of the experience that's not working. I know I might be in the minority but I'm not here to scroll through the all-page.

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

So I recognize that these preferences are going to be different for everyone. I've been enjoying my time here thus far but occasionally I look at other instances to see what their native look and feel is like, or to more easily see if they have communities I'm interested in subscribing to. Most of them look pretty similar but I've only just looked at kbin.social and I find the layout far more attractive.

To be more specific, I find it's use of horizontal space more appealing. There's less dead space left on my widescreen monitor. The fonts are collectively a little smaller and less bold, so I feel like I can browse more content in between scrolls. The usage of space here feels more suitable to a mobile format, in my opinion. I'm not terribly interested in picking up and moving just for the sake of readability, so it would be nice if there were more options we could implement locally.

I don't like bringing attention to deficiencies without having anything useful to contribute, but if I knew a way around this problem I would have implemented it (and I'm still trying but there are precious few worthwhile resources for this in Brave/Chromium), and I feel others could benefit from this topic being raised. I would love to hear what you think.

view more: next ›

cyanarchy

joined 1 year ago