I don't think there's necessarily anything exact about it. More than acting differently, sometimes we just exist differently, and the lack of acceptance is mostly learned imo
degen
Counterpoint: jumping right into lisp or haskell can be useful to get an idea of the paradigm too. Some concepts are so foreign it's almost better to be farther from the imperative or procedural stuff sometimes.
There's a lot of uncanny movement for sure. It looks almost like it's stabilized sometimes.
I'd say it's either AI or Disney animatronic.
That's a good point. I've been thinking of it as a natural progression of the anti net neutrality/"protect the children" pushes we've been seeing in the states. Tbh I thought it seemed more in character for a government like the UK.
I see the parallels, but is it really causal? I feel like this was going to happen given the state of net neutrality in general with or without Gaza.
I perhaps may be ostensibly gnu here per se, but I have read a few words
I haven't looked at the article yet and only superficially poked around with I2P, but I think the idea is that user adoption is the key to better speeds and reliability given the P2P nature. That said, I found it to be daunting as well just getting into it.
Privacy and security in general are like that for me because a lot of the pitfalls come with how you use the tech and not just the structures they provide.
My friend, you have looked into the abyss and said "Yes"
Gotta love that I've had my daily use machine running nixos for a couple years now and I don't even know what that is 😂
really fits the snowflake vibe too
I think the reflex naturally makes sense, but from the people I personally know to be outspoken and definitionally feminist, it's more like calling yourself a feminist says you explicitly side with the feminist cause. Sort of like saying you're anti-racist rather than identifying as someone lacking racism, which is actually a farce when we're all biased.
None of them do. They just edit things down to the very few moments that make them look like they're winning a debate, and even those moments are superficial, construed, or they don't know that they're actually losing. If it's live or in person, conflicting views and evidence are avoided or just ignored. They're all snakes as if snakes were made of slime.