dick_fineman

joined 6 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a direct democracy, so generally Citizens decide what constitutes "service"...or at worst "representatives" (if we'd building off the framework of the idea). As far as administrative regions vs. federal..well, assuming we have a system that's not broken and janky like this one, I think we could manage. As far as weighting things like "health risks", yeah that's a serious weakness here...but not an unaddressable one.

What I see is a world where we aren't screeching about "immigrants" because most folks are similarly just residents. And residents have every right and protection as a citizen...aside from voting or holding office. I see a world where the responsibility of such power also comes with commitment to building society...rather than simply being born, whining, and burning everything down in a tantrum...as we basically see now with bourgeoisie white folks.

Don't throw an idea away just because it isn't immediately a panacea to every broken aspect of our current system.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

Shh...we need the dream of possibility.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Humans in 2025 are...well, mostly horrible. So if we're working with this stock, it's never going to work. It's more of an idea that works really well AFTER the morons die from COVID/etc. because they refused to wear a mask unless that mask let them brutalize brown folks. Long-term, I think it's in idea we shouldn't bin (as a species). But it absolutely won't work TODAY.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah it's one of those ideas that work great if it's the way we had always done things for several generations...but it's not gonna work if we try to start it when anyone alive now is still...well...alive.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago

No I agree it absolutely would NOT work any time near this generation. It's not happening in our lifetimes, and if it does...that's probably bad. But conceptually, it is feasible...assuming like 50 other variables we are currently missing.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The way I imagined it, you would get a wage for your service and service would be customizable to account for any disability, including severe intellectual-disability.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago

Lol. Well let's split the difference then...molotov dildo.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

Heinlein gets shit on for this, but his "citizenship through service" idea always made sense to me. Yeah you have rights, can work a regular job, and have all the benefits we traditionally associate with "citizenship" by simply being a legal resident...but if you want to vote or hold office, you need to spend a few years contributing. Maybe that's military service, or maybe that's working as a teacher in a low-income area. Regardless, voting is a privilege that SHOULD be earned by contributing to the society you want to impact FIRST.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You were thinking dildo, I was thinking molotov cocktail. We are not the same.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz sandbagged Bernie and there is absolutely no denying it. And you're right, she did it because the DNC, just like the GOP, is more than happy to suck the dick of the rich man. But neither the DNC nor the GOP actually matter...it's what the voters believe. And, I'm not sure if you noticed or not, but all those kids who grew up post-9/11 are largely pretty fucking overt with their opposition to the rich man. Times they are a changing. The old parties can get on board, or they can be burned down with everything else.

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 14 points 2 months ago

I help folks with disabilities get jobs, so I'm familiar. I generally avoid fast food for my people, because it's degrading and no one really wants a McJob. That being said, the bot actually makes it easier to apply, and they immediately schedule an interview...because they don't care what your resume says and they just need warm bodies to throw at angry customers. Again, I avoid it for my folks wherever possible.

 

Residential was my first job in HS. I went to school for Psychology and really wanted to do something in that field at the time. A mentor recommended a local residential facility I won't name, and I made the mistake of explaining I wanted to gain "experience". Something to keep in mind is that I'm 6'5, back then was about 240lbs, and my work experience included bouncing and other forms of physical security (among other things).

So this place handled behavioral issues, traumatic brain injuries, and folks with intellectual disabilities. Each of those 3 had their main "campus". And each unit had a "clever" name that was meant to encapsulate the flavor. For example, we had "Brown Hall" for the most violent folks, due to the fact that A) dried blood is brown, and B) so is feces. Another unit was called "Buttonwood" for the younger kids with ID (cute as a "button"), etc. Well, I made the mistake of saying I wanted to gain "experience". So they started me out, 0 experience in this field, in "Wildwood". Wildwood, ostensibly, was a mix of all 3 campuses, and focused on folks who needed 24/7 access to nurses and medically-trained staff. Unlike the other units (which would have nurses visit every day to administer meds), we had our own nursing substation.

As the name implies, it was "wild". Anyway, after all of my training (if memory serves it was a month/160-hours of VERY intensive training covering all sorts of topics, especially non-injurious physical restraints) they gave me a group. I had a 90lb 17-year old non-verbal with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome who could barely walk (let's call him "Teddy"), a 250lb bipolar-psychotic in his 20s ("Lebron"), and 180lb guy with Down's also in his 20s ("Willy"). The names are fake, of course.

Long story short, after a week on the actual job, I interrupted Lebron raping Teddy. Teddy and Lebron were roommates. Undisclosed to me, Lebron had a history of weird rapey/unwanted sexual behavior with other clients...but the Unit Manager thought it was a great idea to bunk him up with a 90lb non-verbal.

Now, during the day, Teddy is "Close Reach", Lebron is "Intermittent Visual-15", and Willy is "Visual Range". But at night, everyone becomes either IV-15, 30, or 45. And they would have staff do chores around the unit like vacuuming or laundry. So I put everyone to bed, everything seems fine, I start a load of laundry, come back to check on Teddy and Lebron...and see an obvious rape in progress. I step back into the hallway, and Lebron (who could be pretty fucking terrifying) angrily walks up, and slams the door in my face, like this has happened before.

I snap back into it, push the door back open and begin yelling at him to leave Teddy alone. I yell for other staff. One comes by and I tell him what happened and to watch them both, as I go to talk to our Supervisor.

I go to the Supervisor, let's call him John, and explain the situation. He has me report it to our state's child-abuse hotline thing because Teddy is 17. I go back to the room and can examine it further. All the sheets and bedding from Teddy's bed are pulled off in the direction of Lebron's...as if he literally pulled him out of bed and Teddy resisted. I'm assured everything will be handled properly as my shift ends, I clock out and go home.

I come back the next day and a detective is waiting for me, along with some corporate douchebag from the company that employed me. I learn that Lebron was arrested, a rape-kit is being processed on Teddy, and they pulled his used diapers to...check for things.

The detective is asking me what I saw, and I am answering honestly. The corporate douchebag is doing their best to undermine EVERYTHING I say. "Oh but you didn't see his erect penis?" shit like that. His back was to me and he had mounted Teddy.

After that I had a target on my back until I left. Other staff SHUNNED me. John did his best to protect me, but that meant being on my ASS about every little thing to make sure corporate/Unit Manager didn't have anything to complain about. And after everything, Lebron came back to the unit. They gave him his own room with a 1-to-1 and a dollar-store "door alarm" on his door.

Immediately after, the groups were changed, I had Teddy and another young guy who had ID and was really easy (he just wanted to color). The state paying for Teddy to stay with us ultimately relocated him to a less terrible facility. And I left residential a few months after that in disgust (for that, and other things I saw), but am still in HS. There are good folks in this field, but residential is a fucking cesspool

 

So I'm very new to the Fediverse. I really don't know much about creating communities here. But I was looking for a community focused on Human Services/Direct Support and couldn't find one...so I figured why not learn the Lemmy interface more and just create one!

I don't want to be a mod. I'm more of a lurker, and am not interested in policing anyone's speech. I mostly intend to back off, unless I see something particularly terrible. I'm very open to suggestions on, well, pretty much everything here. And if you want to be a mod, I guess message me and we can talk.

I hope this becomes something useful to folks working in Human Services!

 

What are your favorite communities for AI discussion?

Thanks in advance.

 

My understanding is that mods can silently remove content from their subreddits, but it will still show up in your comment-history. However, admins can silently remove content and it will NOT be in your comment history. Well, when I'm logged out, I noticed some of my comments were "removed" but when I'm logged in they show up. Looking at the comments more closely, I don't believe they broke any rules...at least not site-wide rules. I received no notification that they were removed either.

Further, these comments ALL related to the Trump/Zelensky interview. I get the need to moderate online communities, but there's something particularly dystopian about quietly censoring someone for expressing political-speech you don't like, and doing it in such a way that they (theoretically) don't even realize they've been censored (if they're not weird paranoid fucks like me). You've just secretly put a bubble around them, all for the crime of political speech you don't like.

Here are some screenshots to verify what I'm saying:

https://i.imgur.com/kff8INQ.png

...

And so the same thing happened when I posted this exact post (above the "...") in another sub on Reddit...one I participate in regularly. And here's how that looks:

https://i.imgur.com/NzRI5T6.png

view more: next ›