I think corporations will just pass on the cost to the consumers if they don’t get subsidies lol.

Given our reliance on it it’s a lot more than just basic supply and demand

they have higher than reported number of build failures, such as presence of panel gap but that does not indicate ALL of them come like that.

McLaren and Maseratis spring to mind, and have similar traits. It does not make them shit cars at all.

lol, do you mean panel gaps? that has more to do with manufacturing process. I'm more referring to the features they provide for the price they're selling at. They're decent.

I can assure you, cars can get a lot less decent than Teslas.... Korean cars in the early 2000s for example...

over the course of 30 years*. people rarely keep cars for that long, let alone an EV. by year 10 most EVs will be clapped as fuck you might just have to sell it for scrap metal

fact is Teslas still represent good value if you're just after a base Model Y and 3. they're are OK, average, decent.

fit and finish is far from German counterparts but if you don't care, and don't want a Chinese EV either you're left with Tesla.

you're phrasing it as if it's common knowledge and everybody should know some shitty local race from the other side of the pond.

you could probably tell judging by the tone he's probably one of those insufferable boomer right? and you know i'm right, how can anyone claim that 1960s cars are better than what car manufacturers have put out in the past 20-30 years? If he's talking from the point of nostalgia it's OK, we all love classic cars. But to dismiss modern cars because apparently people that built them died is just stupid.