[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shaun said it better than I can (nitter link):

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When the thing you enjoy and rely on is privately owned, the only way you can express your disappointment is to vote with your dollar.

Edit - the Post has always been too neolib for me to read regularly. I am not a subscriber

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

...everyone knows the positives. People who don't eat edibles really should be aware of the negatives, since if you're not expecting it, it could seem like something much worse.

This is honestly a bad situation overall. I live somewhere its legal and I occasionally imbibe,but I wouldn't want the surprise. I work nights, this could get me fired. What if someone's kid ate some, or someone on probation who needs to pass drug tests?

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

There are no checks whatsoever, no email or phone number required, no verification options—it just hands you an account for a 99-year-old, with full access to all chat features. (It took maybe five clicks from having no account to being able to play Blood & Gore.)

Come on now Kotaku. I was a kid once on the internet. I lied about my age once to sign up for Neopets, which had text forums, private messages and user-created pages. You could even use HTML and hotlink images. It really wasn't a big deal because my parents paid attention to what I did online, and the audience of the website was just children or people who wanted to play a simple game.

My mom ended up playing it, so she must have known I lied about my age to get access. She had hella neopoints.

For content marked 17+, you do need to verify your age with documentation

WHY IS THERE CONTENT FOR 17+ ON ROBLOX? Isn't this the TRUE child safety problem? Why do this at all? Why attract people looking for 17+ content on a platform for children??? I read that Hindenburg report, the entire platform is a mess. This company deserves to fail and those investors deserve to be left holding the bag.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pssh everyone knows the only correct diet for a cat is their natural one: giant ocean predators (salmon and tuna) and corn-fed livestock. All mixed up with preservatives and taurine and ash, just like their mawmaw cats used to make!

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Ah yea, everyone that has an opinion that isn't mine is dangerous and deserves to be silenced. I totally agree. I think lemmy.world should refederate, and then defederate a second time, just to make sure they get the message.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

….theres a dead bug on the counter and you call this nigh impeccable?

I’m never eating dinner at your house

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

"feculate carnivore" returns no results on google. Oblate carnivore returns results for obligate carnivores, looks to be that obligate/oblate is used interchangeably?

I haven't heard either of these terms as a native English speaker. Perhaps they are regional terms, or terms from another language?

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Survivors of the resource wars will send their children to the plastic mines to work for bottle caps

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

Ok I’ll say it.

What’s Figma?

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It takes a long time to deliver these decisions. The majority opinion is written weeks beforehand, with hundreds of man hours put into it by the justices and their clerks. Alito would have already read and approved it (or he would have joined Thomas in dissent). They heard the arguments for the case on another day, this is just the deliverance of the ruling.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There's a newer article on the website about this person getting booted(?) off Privex because one of their business partners found Privex's response to this writer objectionable. Here is the other article. From just what this person chose to post, it seems they host loli/shota content (drawings). Uurg.

(I did not do any further research than skim the articles he put on his site).

The research itself is... a nice resource. But... if you thought the image the blog writer chose for his article was a red flag, your instincts were good.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

echolalia

joined 6 months ago